Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 69, Issue 5 1673-1683, Copyright © 1993 by APS

ARTICLES

Effects of transient depolarizing potentials on the firing rate of cat neocortical neurons

A. D. Reyes and E. E. Fetz
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

1. The effects of excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) on interspike intervals (ISIs) of neocortical neurons can be mimicked by pulse potentials (PPs) produced by current injection. The present report documents the dependence of the ISI shortening on the amplitudes of PPs and EPSPs and on the firing rate of the affected neuron. 2. In rhythmically firing necortical neurons, the ISI shortenings caused by PPs arriving at specific times in the ISI can be described by a shortening-delay (S-D) curve. The S-D curve yields three measures of the PPs' ability to shorten the ISI: 1) the mean ISI shortening, S; 2) the maximum shortening, Smax; and 3) the effective interval, defined as the portion of the ISI in which the PP consistently shortens the ISI. For PPs ranging between 80 microV and 3.6 mV (and cells firing at 25 imp/s), the mean shortening increased with amplitude h as S (ms) = 1.2*h (mV)1.24 (r = 0.94; P < 0.01). Smax increased linearly with amplitude as 4.9 ms/mV (r = 0.86, P < 0.01). The effective interval (as a percentage of the ISI) increased slightly with PP amplitude and had a mean value of 65 +/- 21% (mean +/- SD). 3. S-D curves obtained with stimulus-evoked EPSPs varied with EPSP amplitude in a manner similar to those of PPs. The relations obtained for stimulus-evoked EPSPs were not statistically different from those obtained for PPs in the same cells. 4. To determine the effect of firing rate. PPs were applied while neurons fired at frequencies ranging from 8 to 71 imp/s. Both S and Smax were approximately inversely proportional to the baseline firing rate (fo) and could be described as: S or Smax = kfo-m. The mean value of the exponent m (+/- SD) was 0.96 +/- 0.25 for S and 1.2 +/- 0.4 for Smax. These values were not statistically different from a value of 1 (1 group, 2-tailed t test). The effective interval did not vary significantly with firing rate. 5. The dependence of S on PP amplitude and baseline firing rate was incorporated into an expression for the average change in firing rate (delta f) produced by PPs occurring at rate fs: delta f = 0.03 h1.24 fs. The delta f increased with PP amplitude but did not vary significantly with the baseline firing rate. The values of delta f calculated from the S-D curves matched the values that were computed directly from the spike trains.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. G. Mancilla, T. J. Lewis, D. J. Pinto, J. Rinzel, and B. W. Connors Synchronization of Electrically Coupled Pairs of Inhibitory Interneurons in Neocortex J. Neurosci., February 21, 2007; 27(8): 2058 - 2073. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. S. Chance Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Analysis for Characterizing Synaptic Efficacy J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1799 - 1808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Goldberg, C. A. Deister, and C. J. Wilson Response Properties and Synchronization of Rhythmically Firing Dendritic Neurons J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 208 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Kanamaru Analysis of synchronization between two modules of pulse neural networks with excitatory and inhibitory connections. Neural Comput., May 1, 2006; 18(5): 1111 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. R. Fernandez, W. H. Mehaffey, and R. W. Turner Dendritic Na+ Current Inactivation Can Increase Cell Excitability By Delaying a Somatic Depolarizing Afterpotential J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 3836 - 3848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. H. Mehaffey, B. Doiron, L. Maler, and R. W. Turner Deterministic Multiplicative Gain Control with Active Dendrites J. Neurosci., October 26, 2005; 25(43): 9968 - 9977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. S. Gutkin, G. B. Ermentrout, and A. D. Reyes Phase-Response Curves Give the Responses of Neurons to Transient Inputs J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2005; 94(2): 1623 - 1635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. Tucker and L. C. Katz Spatiotemporal Patterns of Excitation and Inhibition Evoked by the Horizontal Network in Layer 2/3 of Ferret Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2003; 89(1): 488 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. S. Turker and R. K. Powers Effects of Common Excitatory and Inhibitory Inputs on Motoneuron Synchronization J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2001; 86(6): 2807 - 2822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Ermentrout, M. Pascal, and B. Gutkin The Effects of Spike Frequency Adaptation and Negative Feedback on the Synchronization of Neural Oscillators Neural Comput., June 1, 2001; 13(6): 1285 - 1310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Neltner, D. Hansel, G. Mato, and C. Meunier Synchrony in Heterogeneous Networks of Spiking Neurons Neural Comput., July 1, 2000; 12(7): 1607 - 1641. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. K. Powers and M. D. Binder Summation of Effective Synaptic Currents and Firing Rate Modulation in Cat Spinal Motoneurons J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2000; 83(1): 483 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. S. Turker and R. K. Powers Effects of Large Excitatory and Inhibitory Inputs on Motoneuron Discharge Rate and Probability J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 829 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]