JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 69: 1725-1735, 1993;
0022-3077/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schotland, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rymer, W. Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schotland, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rymer, W. Z.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 69, Issue 5 1725-1735, Copyright © 1993 by APS


ARTICLES

Wipe and flexion reflexes of the frog. I. Kinematics and EMG patterns

J. L. Schotland and W. Z. Rymer
Department of Physiology, Northwestern University Medical School, Lakeside, Chicago, Illinois.

1. We evaluated the hypothesis that the neural control of complex motor behaviors is simplified by building movement sequences from a series of simple neural "building blocks." In particular, we compared two reflex behaviors of the frog, flexion withdrawal and the hindlimb-hindlimb wipe reflex, to determine whether a single neural circuit that coordinates flexion withdrawal is incorporated as the first element in a sequence of neural circuits comprising the wipe. The neural organization of these two reflexes was compared using a quantitative analysis of movement kinematics and muscle activity patterns [electromyograms (EMGs)]. 2. The three-dimensional coordinates of the position of the foot over time and the angular excursion of hip, knee, and ankle joints were recorded using a WATSMART infrared emitter-detector system. These data were quantified using principal-components analysis to provide a measure of the shape (eigenvalues) and orientation (eigen-vector coefficients) of the movement trajectories. The latencies and magnitudes of EMGs of seven muscles acting at the hip, knee, and ankle were analyzed over the interval from EMG onset to movement onset, and EMG magnitudes during the initial flexion of the limb. These variables were compared during flexion withdrawal and the initial flexion movement of the limb during the hindlimb-hindlimb wipe reflex (before the onset of the frequently rhythmic portion when the stimulus is removed) when the two reflexes were elicited from comparable stimulus locations. 3. In both the flexion reflex and the initial movement segment of the wipe reflex, the foot moves along a relatively straight line. However, the foot is directed to a more rostral and lateral position during flexion than during wipe. All three joints flex during flexion withdrawal, whereas during the wipe, the knee and ankle joints flex but the angular excursion of the hip joint may vary. The different orientations of the movement trajectories are associated with EMG patterns that differ in both timing and magnitude between the two reflexes. 4. The differences in the kinematics and EMG patterns of the two reflexes during unrestrained movements make it unlikely that the neural circuit that coordinates flexion withdrawal is incorporated as the first element in the sequence of neural circuits underlying the wipe reflex. 5. Unlike the wipe reflex, during flexion withdrawal there is no apparent constraint on the accuracy of placement at the end of the movement, yet the animals nevertheless achieved consistent final positions of both the foot and of each joint. The implications of these findings with respect to the controlled variables are discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
W. J. Kargo and S. F. Giszter
Individual Premotor Drive Pulses, Not Time-Varying Synergies, Are the Units of Adjustment for Limb Trajectories Constructed in Spinal Cord
J. Neurosci., March 5, 2008; 28(10): 2409 - 2425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. G. Richardson, J.-J. E. Slotine, E. Bizzi, and M. C. Tresch
Intrinsic Musculoskeletal Properties Stabilize Wiping Movements in the Spinalized Frog
J. Neurosci., March 23, 2005; 25(12): 3181 - 3191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. B. Hart and S. F. Giszter
Modular Premotor Drives and Unit Bursts as Primitives for Frog Motor Behaviors
J. Neurosci., June 2, 2004; 24(22): 5269 - 5282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. J. Kargo and S. F. Giszter
Afferent Roles in Hindlimb Wipe-Reflex Trajectories: Free-Limb Kinematics and Motor Patterns
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2000; 83(3): 1480 - 1501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
W. J. Kargo and S. F. Giszter
Rapid Correction of Aimed Movements by Summation of Force-Field Primitives
J. Neurosci., January 1, 2000; 20(1): 409 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online