Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 69, Issue 5 1736-1748, Copyright © 1993 by APS

ARTICLES

Wipe and flexion reflexes of the frog. II. Response to perturbations

J. L. Schotland and W. Z. Rymer
Department of Physiology, Northwestern University Medical School, Lakeside, Chicago, Illinois.

1. To evaluate the hypothesis that the neural control of sensorimotor transformations may be simplified by using a single control variable, we compared the movement kinematics and muscle activity patterns [electromyograms (EMGs)] of the frog during flexion withdrawal and the hind limb-hind limb wipe reflex before and after adding an external load. In addition, the flexibility of spinal cord circuitry underlying the hind limb-hind limb wipe reflex was evaluated by comparing wipes before and after removal of one of the contributing muscles by cutting a muscle nerve. 2. The kinematics of the movements were recorded using a WATSMART infrared emitter-detector system and quantified using principal-components analysis to provide a measure of the shape (eigenvalues) and orientation (eigenvector coefficients) of the movement trajectories. The neural pattern coordinating the movements was characterized by the latencies and magnitudes of EMGs of seven muscles acting at the hip, knee, and ankle. These variables were compared 1) during flexion withdrawal and the initial movement segment of the limb during the hind limb-hind limb wipe reflex in both unrestrained movements and in movements executed when a load equal to approximately 10% of the animal's body weight was attached to a distal limb segment and 2) during the initial movement segment of the wipe reflex before and after cutting the nerve to the knee flexor-hip extensor, iliofibularis. 3. Addition of the load had no discernible effect on the end-point position of the foot during either reflex. However, during the loaded flexion reflex, the ankle joint did not move until after the hip and knee joints had moved to their normal positions. This delayed flexion of the ankle was accompanied by large increases in the magnitude of EMG activity in two ankle muscles that exceeded the levels found during unrestrained movements. Significant changes in the temporal organization of the EMG pattern accompanied the change in joint angle relations during flexion withdrawal. 4. Despite the addition of an external load, all animals successfully and reliably removed the stimulus during the wipe reflex, and the relative timing of both the EMG pattern and joint angle motion was preserved. 5. Immediately after section of the nerve to a single muscle (iliofibularis), all animals successfully and reliably removed the stimulus during the wipe reflex. The relative timing of muscle activation was preserved, accompanied by a reduction in the activity level of gluteus magnus, a muscle with action reciprocal to iliofibularis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. G. Richardson, J.-J. E. Slotine, E. Bizzi, and M. C. Tresch Intrinsic Musculoskeletal Properties Stabilize Wiping Movements in the Spinalized Frog J. Neurosci., March 23, 2005; 25(12): 3181 - 3191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Matheson and V. Durr Load compensation in targeted limb movements of an insect J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2003; 206(18): 3175 - 3186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Kargo and S. F. Giszter Afferent Roles in Hindlimb Wipe-Reflex Trajectories: Free-Limb Kinematics and Motor Patterns J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2000; 83(3): 1480 - 1501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]