JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 69: 1880-1889, 1993;
0022-3077/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Segraves, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Park, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Segraves, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Park, K.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 69, Issue 6 1880-1889, Copyright © 1993 by APS


ARTICLES

The relationship of monkey frontal eye field activity to saccade dynamics

M. A. Segraves and K. Park
Department of Neurobiology and Physiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208-3520.

1. In this study, we compared the temporal waveforms of the activity of monkey frontal eye field movement neurons with the dynamics of saccadic eye movements. 2. Movement neurons in the frontal eye field were selected according to previously published criteria. They had little or no response to visual stimuli in a fixation task, and equivalent activity before visually guided and memory-guided saccades. We studied corticotectal neurons and corticopontine neurons identified by antidromic excitation, as well as neurons whose projections were not identified. 3. These neurons had a peak activation at a mean of 13 ms before the saccade began. However, rather than falling off rapidly as the saccade ended, most neurons continued to fire after the saccade, returning to baseline at a mean of 93 ms after the end of the saccade. 4. We measured the decrement in activity for these neurons during the saccade. Although a few neurons showed decrements of > 60% of their peak activity level, the average activity dropped only 16.9%, with some neurons actually showing a rise in activity during the saccade. If we ignored the latency between peak in activity and saccade start and measured the fall in activity for a period equal to one saccade duration after the peak, the average drop in activity was still only 34.9%. Thus the activity of these neurons did not appear to be closely related to dynamic motor error, which falls from its maximum value to zero over the time course of a saccade. 5. These results suggest that a focus of movement activity within the topographic map in the frontal eye field specifies the amplitude and direction for an impending saccade, whereas the peak of movement activity signals the time to initiate a saccade. 6. Unlike the superior colliculus, the activity of frontal eye field movement neurons does not appear to be related to dynamic events that occur during the saccade, such as motor error.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. Heinzle, K. Hepp, and K. A. C. Martin
A Microcircuit Model of the Frontal Eye Fields
J. Neurosci., August 29, 2007; 27(35): 9341 - 9353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. M. McPeek
Incomplete Suppression of Distractor-Related Activity in the Frontal Eye Field Results in Curved Saccades
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2699 - 2711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Izawa, H. Suzuki, and Y. Shinoda
Suppression of Visually and Memory-Guided Saccades Induced by Electrical Stimulation of the Monkey Frontal Eye Field. I. Suppression of Ipsilateral Saccades
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2004; 92(4): 2248 - 2260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. A. Ioannides, M. Corsi-Cabrera, P. B.C. Fenwick, Y. del Rio Portilla, N. A. Laskaris, A. Khurshudyan, D. Theofilou, T. Shibata, S. Uchida, T. Nakabayashi, et al.
MEG Tomography of Human Cortex and Brainstem Activity in Waking and REM Sleep Saccades
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2004; 14(1): 56 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. H. Snyder, J. L. Calton, A. R. Dickinson, and B. M. Lawrence
Eye-Hand Coordination: Saccades Are Faster When Accompanied by a Coordinated Arm Movement
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2002; 87(5): 2279 - 2286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. A. Sommer and R. H. Wurtz
Frontal Eye Field Sends Delay Activity Related to Movement, Memory, and Vision to the Superior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2001; 85(4): 1673 - 1685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. Quaia, P. Lefevre, and L. M. Optican
Model of the Control of Saccades by Superior Colliculus and Cerebellum
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 999 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. C. Dias and M. A. Segraves
Muscimol-Induced Inactivation of Monkey Frontal Eye Field: Effects on Visually and Memory-Guided Saccades
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1999; 81(5): 2191 - 2214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. W. Anderson, E. L. Keller, N. J. Gandhi, and S. Das
Two-Dimensional Saccade-Related Population Activity in Superior Colliculus in Monkey
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1998; 80(2): 798 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online