Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 69, Issue 6 2174-2187, Copyright © 1993 by APS

ARTICLES

Inhibition in ON-OFF directionally selective ganglion cells of the rabbit retina

F. R. Amthor and N. M. Grzywacz
Department of Psychology and Neurobiology Research Center, University of Alabama, Birmingham 35294.

1. We have investigated the inhibitory mechanisms modulating the extracellularly recorded responses of ON-OFF directionally selective (DS) ganglion cells of the rabbit retina. Our investigations used both moving spots and apparent motion. The latter was produced by both prolonged light steps, which simulate movement of an edge, and light flashes, which simulate movement of a spot or slit. 2. Within the excitatory receptive-field center of DS ganglion cells, apparent motion with prolonged light steps elicits null-direction inhibition whose strength rises to 90% of maximum in 160 +/- 110 ms (7 cells) and then decays slowly, remaining above baseline longer than 2,000 ms for short interslit distances. 3. Prolonged light steps are generally effective for inhibiting any given excitatory receptive-field locus from an ovate-shaped area that extends asymmetrically in the direction that would be previously traversed by null-direction moving objects. This inhibitory area is typically larger than one-half the size of the receptive-field center. The strength of the inhibition is greater at short than long distances within this area. 4. The rise and fall times of the null-direction inhibition elicited by apparent motion using prolonged light steps are somewhat faster at large than short interslit distances. 5. Short light flashes (at sufficiently long interslit delays) elicit inhibition not only from the same asymmetric, ovate-shaped inhibitory field as long steps of light, but also from loci completely surrounding the second slit. This implies that the asymmetric, null-direction-specific inhibition is due to a temporally sustained mechanism. The symmetric inhibition elicited by short flashes may be due to the presence of the antagonistic surround mechanism within the receptive-field center. The apparent absence of this surround inhibition for preferred-direction apparent motion during prolonged light steps may be due to masking by facilitation that is strongly evoked by long steps, but not flashes of light (see accompanying paper). 6. The relatively slow rise time and sustained time course of the inhibition elicited by null-direction apparent motion within the excitatory receptive field center appears to distinguish it from the inhibition elicited by stimulation within the receptive field surround, which has a much faster rise time and more transient time course. However, the sustained, null-direction inhibitory mechanism that can be elicited by prolonged light steps within the excitatory receptive field center extends into the surround on the side of the receptive-field center previously traversed during null-direction motion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. G. de Polavieja Neuronal algorithms that detect the temporal order of events. Neural Comput., September 1, 2006; 18(9): 2102 - 2121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. F. Stasheff and R. H. Masland Functional Inhibition in Direction-Selective Retinal Ganglion Cells: Spatiotemporal Extent and Intralaminar Interactions J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2002; 88(2): 1026 - 1039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Ibbotson and C.W.G. Clifford Interactions Between ON and OFF Signals in Directional Motion Detectors Feeding the NOT of the Wallaby J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2001; 86(2): 997 - 1005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. R. Taylor, S. He, W. R. Levick, and D. I. Vaney Dendritic Computation of Direction Selectivity by Retinal Ganglion Cells Science, September 29, 2000; 289(5488): 2347 - 2350. [Abstract] [Full Text]