Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 69, Issue 6 2209-2221, Copyright © 1993 by APS

ARTICLES

Position-specific adaptation in complex cell receptive fields of the cat striate cortex

S. Marlin, R. Douglas and M. Cynader
Department of Psychology, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

1. Responses of complex cells in cat striate cortex were studied with flashed light slit stimuli. The responses to slits flashed in different positions in the receptive field were assessed quantitatively before and after periods of prolonged stimulation of one small region of the receptive field. This type of prolonged stimulation resulted in reduced responsivity over a limited zone within the complex cell receptive field. 2. The adaptation-induced responsivity decrement was generally observed in both the ON and OFF response profiles but could also be restricted to one or the other. In general, the magnitude of the response decrements was greatest in the ON response profiles. The adaptation-induced response decrement did not necessarily spread throughout the receptive field but was restricted to a small region surrounding the adapted receptive field position (RFP). Adaptation spread equally widely across the ON and OFF response profiles despite the smaller adaptation effects in the OFF profile. 3. The adaptation effects from repeated stimulation at a single RFP did not spread symmetrically across the receptive field, and a given cell's preferred direction of motion indicated the direction of the asymmetric spread of the adaptation. RFPs that would be stimulated by a light slit originating at the point of adaptation and moving in the preferred direction (preferred side) showed greater adaptation-induced response decrements than did RFPs that would be stimulated by a light slit moving in the opposite direction from the point of adaptation (nonpreferred side). There was significant enhancement of responses at some RFPs on the non-preferred side of the point of adaptation. This asymmetric spread of adaptation could be caused by adaptation of inhibitory connections that contribute to complex cell direction selectivity. 4. The asymmetry of adaptation was significantly different for the ON and OFF response profiles. The asymmetric spread of adaptation for the ON response profile was similar to that observed previously in simple cells with greater decrements in the preferred direction side of the point of adaptation. However, the OFF response profiles showed less directional asymmetry in the spread of adaptation and showed greater decrements at RFPs in the nonpreferred direction side of the point of adaptation. 5. The similarity between the spread of adaptation in simple and complex cells suggests that the adaptation in these cells is occurring through a common mechanism. The directional asymmetry of the spread of adaptation is likely due to a local postsynaptic mechanism of adaptation rather than presynaptic transmitter depletion.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Kohn Visual Adaptation: Physiology, Mechanisms, and Functional Benefits J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3155 - 3164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Heitwerth, R. Kern, J. H. van Hateren, and M. Egelhaaf Motion Adaptation Leads to Parsimonious Encoding of Natural Optic Flow by Blowfly Motion Vision System J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 1761 - 1769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y.-X. Fu, K. Djupsund, H. Gao, B. Hayden, K. Shen, and Y. Dan Temporal Specificity in the Cortical Plasticity of Visual Space Representation Science, June 14, 2002; 296(5575): 1999 - 2003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]