Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 70, Issue 1 431-443, Copyright © 1993 by APS

ARTICLES

Covert orienting of attention in macaques. I. Effects of behavioral context

E. M. Bowman, V. J. Brown, C. Kertzman, U. Schwarz and D. L. Robinson
Section on Visual Behavior, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

1. A task was used by Posner (1980) to measure shifts of attention that occurred covertly, in the absence of an eye movement or other orienting response. This paradigm was used here to assess the nature of covert attentional orienting in monkeys to develop an animal model for neurophysiological studies. Shifts of attention were measurable in monkeys and were consistent across a variety of experimental conditions. 2. The paradigm required that monkeys fixate and release a bar at the appearance of a target, which was preceded by a cue. Reaction times to targets that followed peripheral cues at the same location (validly cued) were significantly faster than those that followed cues in the opposite visual field (invalidly cued). This difference was defined as the validity effect, which as in humans, is used as the measure of a covert attentional shift. 3. When the proportion of validly to invalidly cued targets was decreased, no change was seen in the validity effect of the monkeys. This is in contrast to humans, for whom the ratio of validly to invalidly cued targets affected the magnitude of the validity effect. When 80% of the targets were preceded by cues at the same location, the validity effect was greatest. The effect was reversed when the proportions were reversed. From this result, it is concluded that cognitive processes can affect covert orienting to peripheral cues in humans, whereas in trained monkeys, performance was automatic. 4. To test whether cognitive influences on attention could be demonstrated in the monkey, an animal was taught to use symbolic, foveal signals to covertly direct attention. The magnitude of this validity effect was greater than that obtained with peripheral cues. 5. The effects of motivational and perceptual processes were tested. Although overall reaction times could be modified, the facilitating effects of the cues persisted. This constancy across motivational and perceptual levels supports the notion that the monkeys were performing the task in an automatic way, under the exogenous control of peripheral cues. 6. Most visual cuing has been tested with visual landmarks at the locations of cues and targets. These monkeys were trained with such landmarks, and when tested without them, the attentional effect of the cues was nearly abolished. These data suggest that local visual features can be important for covert orienting. 7. To determine the spatial extent of the effect of the cue, monkeys and humans were tested with four cue-target distances (0-60 degrees).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. H. Snyder, A. R. Dickinson, and J. L. Calton Preparatory Delay Activity in the Monkey Parietal Reach Region Predicts Reach Reaction Times J. Neurosci., October 4, 2006; 26(40): 10091 - 10099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. F Balan and J. Gottlieb Integration of Exogenous Input into a Dynamic Salience Map Revealed by Perturbing Attention J. Neurosci., September 6, 2006; 26(36): 9239 - 9249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Bisley and M. E. Goldberg Neural Correlates of Attention and Distractibility in the Lateral Intraparietal Area J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1696 - 1717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Wei and D. E. Angelaki Foveal Visual Strategy during Self-Motion Is Independent of Spatial Attention J. Neurosci., January 11, 2006; 26(2): 564 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. E. Cohen, I. S. Cohen, and G. W. Gifford III Modulation of LIP Activity by Predictive Auditory and Visual Cues Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2004; 14(12): 1287 - 1301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Bisley and M. E. Goldberg Neuronal Activity in the Lateral Intraparietal Area and Spatial Attention Science, January 3, 2003; 299(5603): 81 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Johnen, H. Wagner, and B. H. Gaese Spatial Attention Modulates Sound Localization in Barn Owls J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2001; 85(2): 1009 - 1012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R. Olson, S. N. Gettner, V. Ventura, R. Carta, and R. E. Kass Neuronal Activity in Macaque Supplementary Eye Field During Planning of Saccades in Response to Pattern and Spatial Cues J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2000; 84(3): 1369 - 1384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Davidson and R. T. Marrocco Local Infusion of Scopolamine Into Intraparietal Cortex Slows Covert Orienting in Rhesus Monkeys J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2000; 83(3): 1536 - 1549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Dorris, T. L. Taylor, R. M. Klein, and D. P. Munoz Influence of Previous Visual Stimulus or Saccade on Saccadic Reaction Times in Monkey J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1999; 81(5): 2429 - 2436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. H. Snyder, A. P. Batista, and R. A. Andersen Change in Motor Plan, Without a Change in the Spatial Locus of Attention, Modulates Activity in Posterior Parietal Cortex J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1998; 79(5): 2814 - 2819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. M. Ward and V. J. Brown Covert Orienting of Attention in the Rat and the Role of Striatal Dopamine J. Neurosci., May 1, 1996; 16(9): 3082 - 3088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]