Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 70, Issue 3 1102-1114, Copyright © 1993 by APS

ARTICLES

Adaptive control for backward quadrupedal walking. III. Stumbling corrective reactions and cutaneous reflex sensitivity

J. A. Buford and J. L. Smith
Department of Physiological Science, University of California, Los Angeles 90024-1568.

1. Four cats were trained to walk backward (BWD) and forward (FWD) on a motorized treadmill. Mechanical (taps) or electrical (pulses) stimuli were applied to the dorsal or ventral aspect of the hind paw during swing or stance. Hindlimb kinematic data, obtained by digitizing 16-mm high-speed film, were synchronized with computer-analyzed electromyograms (EMG) recorded from anterior biceps femoris (ABF), vastus lateralis (VL), lateral gastrocnemius (LG), tibialis anterior (TA), and semitendinosus (ST). Responses to taps and pulses, as well as the modulation in cutaneous reflex sensitivity to pulses, were described for both walking directions and stimulus locations. 2. After dorsal taps that obstructed FWD swing, the hindlimb initially drew back away from the obstacle with knee flexion and ST activation, ankle extension with TA suppression and LG activation, and hip extension with ABF facilitation. Next, the limb was raised over the obstacle with resumed TA activity and enhanced knee and ankle flexion, and then compensatory knee and ankle extension positioned the limb for the ensuing stance phase. 3. For ventral taps that obstructed BWD swing, the initial response also tended to draw the limb away from the obstacle with hip and ankle flexion and TA facilitation and reduced knee flexion with weak VL facilitation and suppression of ST activity. Next, ST activity resumed as knee and ankle flexion raised the limb over the obstacle, and then compensatory extension completed the swing phase for BWD walking. Thus the initial kinematic and EMG responses to obstacles were opposite for BWD versus FWD swing, and these responses were consistent with active avoidance of the obstacles. Responses during BWD walking were subtle, however, compared with those for FWD. 4. After nonobstructing taps (ventral FWD, dorsal BWD), ST and TA activation and knee and ankle flexion were coincident, demonstrating that the aforementioned differences in responses to obstructing obstacles were not simply location dependent. Regardless of the direction of walking or the location of stimulation, taps applied during stance had little immediate kinematic effect, but the subsequent swing phase was usually exaggerated, as if the response was programmed to avoid any lingering obstacle. 5. Electrical pulses did not elicit the full-blown responses typically evoked by taps. The sequencing in activation of ST and TA characteristic after laps was absent after pulses, and there were rarely dramatic kinematic responses to pulses like those easily elicited by taps. There were, in fact, few differences in responses to electrical stimulation for BWD versus FWD walking.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Haridas, E. P. Zehr, and J. E. Misiaszek Adaptation of Cutaneous Stumble Correction When Tripping Is Part of the Locomotor Environment J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2008; 99(6): 2789 - 2797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Frigon and S. Rossignol Short-Latency Crossed Inhibitory Responses in Extensor Muscles During Locomotion in the Cat J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 989 - 998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Bernard, L. Bouyer, J. Provencher, and S. Rossignol Study of Cutaneous Reflex Compensation During Locomotion After Nerve Section in the Cat J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2007; 97(6): 4173 - 4185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. E. Musselman and J. F. Yang Loading the Limb During Rhythmic Leg Movements Lengthens the Duration of Both Flexion and Extension in Human Infants J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1247 - 1257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. McVea and K. G. Pearson Long-Lasting, Context-Dependent Modification of Stepping in the Cat After Repeated Stumbling-Corrective Responses J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 659 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. A. Rybak, K. Stecina, N. A. Shevtsova, and D. A. McCrea Modelling spinal circuitry involved in locomotor pattern generation: insights from the effects of afferent stimulation J. Physiol., December 1, 2006; 577(2): 641 - 658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. Yang and M. Gorassini Spinal and Brain Control of Human Walking: Implications for Retraining of Walking Neuroscientist, October 1, 2006; 12(5): 379 - 389. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Rossignol, R. Dubuc, and J.-P. Gossard Dynamic Sensorimotor Interactions in Locomotion Physiol Rev, January 1, 2006; 86(1): 89 - 154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Quevedo, K. Stecina, S. Gosgnach, and D. A. McCrea Stumbling Corrective Reaction During Fictive Locomotion in the Cat J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 2045 - 2052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Quevedo, K. Stecina, and D. A. McCrea Intracellular Analysis of Reflex Pathways Underlying the Stumbling Corrective Reaction During Fictive Locomotion in the Cat J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 2053 - 2062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. P. Zehr and S. R. Hundza Forward and Backward Arm Cycling Are Regulated by Equivalent Neural Mechanisms J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2005; 93(1): 633 - 640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. P. Zehr and J. Duysens Regulation of Arm and Leg Movement during Human Locomotion Neuroscientist, August 1, 2004; 10(4): 347 - 361. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. H. Ting and J. M. Macpherson Ratio of Shear to Load Ground-Reaction Force May Underlie the Directional Tuning of the Automatic Postural Response to Rotation and Translation J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2004; 92(2): 808 - 823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Y. C. Pang and J. F. Yang Sensory Gating for the Initiation of the Swing Phase in Different Directions of Human Infant Stepping J. Neurosci., July 1, 2002; 22(13): 5734 - 5740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. E. Burke, A. M. Degtyarenko, and E. S. Simon Patterns of Locomotor Drive to Motoneurons and Last-Order Interneurons: Clues to the Structure of the CPG J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2001; 86(1): 447 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Kargo and S. F. Giszter Rapid Correction of Aimed Movements by Summation of Force-Field Primitives J. Neurosci., January 1, 2000; 20(1): 409 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Duysens, F. Clarac, and H. Cruse Load-Regulating Mechanisms in Gait and Posture: Comparative Aspects Physiol Rev, January 1, 2000; 80(1): 83 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Macpherson and J. Fung Weight Support and Balance During Perturbed Stance in the Chronic Spinal Cat J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1999; 82(6): 3066 - 3081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Smith, P. Carlson-Kuhta, and T. V. Trank Forms of Forward Quadrupedal Locomotion. III. A Comparison of Posture, Hindlimb Kinematics, and Motor Patterns for Downslope and Level Walking J Neurophysiol, April 1, 1998; 79(4): 1702 - 1716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Ashley-Ross and G. V. Lauder Motor Patterns and Kinematics During Backward Walking in the Pacific Giant Salamander: Evidence for Novel Motor Output J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1997; 78(6): 3047 - 3060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. P. Zehr, T. Komiyama, and R. B. Stein Cutaneous Reflexes During Human Gait: Electromyographic and Kinematic Responses to Electrical Stimulation J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1997; 77(6): 3311 - 3325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. M. H. Van Wezel, F. A. M. Ottenhoff, and J. Duysens Dynamic Control of Location-Specific Information in Tactile Cutaneous Reflexes from the Foot during Human Walking J. Neurosci., May 15, 1997; 17(10): 3804 - 3814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]