JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 70: 1644-1655, 1993;
0022-3077/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hartveit, E.
Right arrow Articles by Heggelund, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hartveit, E.
Right arrow Articles by Heggelund, P.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 70, Issue 4 1644-1655, Copyright © 1993 by APS


ARTICLES

Brain stem modulation of spatial receptive field properties of single cells in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat

E. Hartveit, S. I. Ramberg and P. Heggelund
Department of Neurophysiology, University of Oslo, Norway.

1. We studied the effect of electrical stimulation of the peribrachial region (PBR) in the brain stem on the visual response of single cells in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) to a light slit presented in a series of positions across the receptive field. The response was plotted against slit position, giving a spatial receptive field profile. 2. PBR stimulation markedly increased the visual response. In the middle of the receptive field center, the absolute response increase was considerably larger than in the peripheral parts of the receptive field or than the increase of spontaneous activity. The PBR stimulation also led to a small increase of the diameter of the receptive field center. 3. The maximum steepness of the receptive field profile for the dLGN cells increased by PBR stimulation. We suggest that the visual resolution in the dLGN cell is directly related to this maximal slope of the receptive field profile rather than to the width of the receptive field center. This would mean that increased input from the PBR, as presumably occurs during arousal, increases the visual resolution of the dLGN cells. 4. For some of the cells we could record S-potentials (slow potentials) in addition to action potentials. This allowed us to directly compared the receptive field center size of a dLGN cell with that of its retinal input. For these cells, the center size was considerably reduced by the geniculate relay. During PBR stimulation, the center size of these cells also increased slightly, but even in this condition it was reduced compared with the retinal input. The maximal slope of the receptive field profile in the dLGN cell during PBR stimulation was larger than for the retinal input. 5. We also examined the effect of ionophoretical application of acetylcholine (ACh) and bicuculline methchloride (BMC) on the spatial receptive field properties of dLGN cells. The effects of ACh were similar to those of PBR stimulation. Application of BMC, on the other hand, made the receptive field profile more similar to that of retinal ganglion cells.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
S. Augustinaite and P. Heggelund
Changes in firing pattern of lateral geniculate neurons caused by membrane potential dependent modulation of retinal input through NMDA receptors
J. Physiol., July 1, 2007; 582(1): 297 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
O. Ruksenas, A. Bulatov, and P. Heggelund
Dynamics of Spatial Resolution of Single Units in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus of Cat During Brief Visual Stimulation
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1445 - 1456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Eyding, J. D. Macklis, U. Neubacher, K. Funke, and F. Worgotter
Selective Elimination of Corticogeniculate Feedback Abolishes the Electroencephalogram Dependence of Primary Visual Cortical Receptive Fields and Reduces Their Spatial Specificity
J. Neurosci., August 6, 2003; 23(18): 7021 - 7033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. J. Zhu and P. Heggelund
Muscarinic Regulation of Dendritic and Axonal Outputs of Rat Thalamic Interneurons: A New Cellular Mechanism for Uncoupling Distal Dendrites
J. Neurosci., February 15, 2001; 21(4): 1148 - 1159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Cai, G. C. Deangelis, and R. D. Freeman
Spatiotemporal Receptive Field Organization in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus of Cats and Kittens
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1997; 78(2): 1045 - 1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online