JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 70: 2226-2240, 1993;
0022-3077/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perell, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perell, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. L.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 70, Issue 6 2226-2240, Copyright © 1993 by APS


ARTICLES

Adaptive control for backward quadrupedal walking. IV. Hindlimb kinetics during stance and swing

K. L. Perell, R. J. Gregor, J. A. Buford and J. L. Smith
Department of Physiological Science, University of California, Los Angeles 90024-1568.

1. Hindlimb step-cycle kinetics of forward (FWD) and backward (BWD) walking in adult cats were assessed. The hindlimb was modeled as a linked system of rigid bodies and inverse-dynamics techniques were used to calculate hip, knee, and ankle joint kinetics. For swing, net torque at each joint was divided into three components: gravitational, motion dependent, and a generalized muscle torque. For stance, vertical and horizontal components of the ground-reaction force applied at a point on the paw (center of pressure) were added to the torque calculations. Muscle torque profiles were matched to electromyograms (EMGs) recorded from hindlimb muscles. 2. Torque profiles for BWD swing were the approximate time reversal of those for FWD swing. At each joint, the net torque during swing was small because the mean motion-dependent and muscle torque components counteracted each other. At the hip a flexor muscle torque persisted except for a brief extensor muscle torque late in FWD swing and at the onset of BWD swing. At the knee the muscle torque was relatively negligible except for a peak flexor muscle torque late in FWD swing and early in BWD swing. At the ankle there was a midswing transition from a flexor to an extensor muscle torque during FWD swing and the reverse was true for BWD swing. 3. The vertical ground-reaction force was greater for the forelimbs than the hindlimbs during FWD stance; the reverse was true for BWD stance. Thus the hindlimbs bore a greater percentage (66%) of body weight than the forelimbs during BWD stance, and the forelimbs bore a greater percentage (59%) during FWD stance. For most of FWD stance, the hindlimb exerted a small propulsive ground-reaction force, but for BWD stance the hindlimb first exerted a braking force and then a propulsive force, with the transition occurring after midstance (59% of stance). 4. At the hip the ground-reaction force vector was oriented anteriorly and then posteriorly to the estimated joint center with a midstance transition during FWD stance. The muscle torque and joint power patterns showed similar transitions, changing from extensor and power generation to flexor and power absorption, respectively. For most of BWD stance the ground-reaction force vector was oriented anteriorly to the joint center and was counter-balanced by a large extensor muscle torque; nonetheless, power was absorbed because the hip flexed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. P. Zehr and S. R. Hundza
Forward and Backward Arm Cycling Are Regulated by Equivalent Neural Mechanisms
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2005; 93(1): 633 - 640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
E. P. Zehr and J. Duysens
Regulation of Arm and Leg Movement during Human Locomotion
Neuroscientist, August 1, 2004; 10(4): 347 - 361.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. M. Reilly and R. W. Blob
Motor control of locomotor hindlimb posture in the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis)
J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2003; 206(23): 4327 - 4340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Y. C. Pang and J. F. Yang
Sensory Gating for the Initiation of the Swing Phase in Different Directions of Human Infant Stepping
J. Neurosci., July 1, 2002; 22(13): 5734 - 5740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
H. Witte, J. Biltzinger, R. Hackert, N. Schilling, M. Schmidt, C. Reich, and M. S. Fischer
Torque patterns of the limbs of small therian mammals during locomotion on flat ground
J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2002; 205(9): 1339 - 1353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. Carlson-Kuhta, T. V. Trank, and J. L. Smith
Forms of Forward Quadrupedal Locomotion. II. A Comparison of Posture, Hindlimb Kinematics, and Motor Patterns for Upslope and Level Walking
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 1998; 79(4): 1687 - 1701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. L. Smith, P. Carlson-Kuhta, and T. V. Trank
Forms of Forward Quadrupedal Locomotion. III. A Comparison of Posture, Hindlimb Kinematics, and Motor Patterns for Downslope and Level Walking
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 1998; 79(4): 1702 - 1716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. A. Ashley-Ross and G. V. Lauder
Motor Patterns and Kinematics During Backward Walking in the Pacific Giant Salamander: Evidence for Novel Motor Output
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1997; 78(6): 3047 - 3060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online