JN Miami Valley Hospital
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 70: 2647-2659, 1993;
0022-3077/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wylie, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Frost, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wylie, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Frost, B. J.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 70, Issue 6 2647-2659, Copyright © 1993 by APS


ARTICLES

Responses of pigeon vestibulocerebellar neurons to optokinetic stimulation. II. The 3-dimensional reference frame of rotation neurons in the flocculus

D. R. Wylie and B. J. Frost
Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

1. The complex spike activity of Purkinje cells in the flocculus in response to rotational flowfields was recorded extracellularly in anesthetized pigeons. 2. The optokinetic stimulus was produced by a rotating "planetarium projector." A light source was placed in the center of a tin cylinder, which was pierced with numerous small holes. A pen motor oscillated the cylinder about its long axis. This apparatus was placed above the bird's head and the resultant rotational flow-field was projected onto screens that surrounded the bird on all four sides. The axis of rotation of the planetarium could be oriented to any position in three-dimensional space. 3. Two types of responses were found: vertical axis (VA; n = 43) neurons responded best to visual rotation about the vertical axis, and H-135i neurons (n = 34) responded best to rotation about a horizontal axis. The preferred orientation of the horizontal axis was at approximately 135 degrees ipsilateral azimuth. VA neurons were excited by rotation about the vertical axis producing forward (temporal to nasal) and backward motion in the ipsilateral and contralateral eyes, respectively, and were inhibited by rotation in the opposite direction. H-135i neurons in the left flocculus were excited by counterclockwise rotation about the 135 degrees ipsilateral horizontal axis and were inhibited by clockwise motion. Thus, the VA and H-135i neurons, respectively, encode visual flowfields resulting from head rotations stimulating the ipsilateral horizontal and ipsilateral anterior semicircular canals. 4. Sixty-seven percent of VA and 80% of H-135i neurons had binocular receptive fields, although for most binocular cells the ipsilateral eye was dominant. Binocular stimulation resulted in a greater depth of modulation than did monocular stimulation of the dominant eye for 69% of the cells. 5. Monocular stimulation of the VA neurons revealed that the best axis for the contralateral eye was tilted back 11 degrees, on average, to the best axis for ipsilateral stimulation. For the H-135i neurons, the best axes for monocular stimulation of the two eyes were approximately the same. 6. By stimulating circumscribed portions of the monocular receptive fields of the H-135i neurons with alternating upward and downward largefield motion, it was revealed that the contralateral receptive fields were bipartite. Upward motion was preferred in the anterior 45 degrees of the contralateral field, and downward motion, was preferred in the central 90 degrees of the contralateral visual field.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
O. A. Masseck and K.-P. Hoffmann
Responses to Moving Visual Stimuli in Pretectal Neurons of the Small-Spotted Dogfish (Scyliorhinus canicula)
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2008; 99(1): 200 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. R. Winship, P. L. Hurd, and D. R. W. Wylie
Spatiotemporal Tuning of Optic Flow Inputs to the Vestibulocerebellum in Pigeons: Differences Between Mossy and Climbing Fiber Pathways
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1266 - 1277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. Karmeier, H. G. Krapp, and M. Egelhaaf
Robustness of the Tuning of Fly Visual Interneurons to Rotatory Optic Flow
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 1626 - 1634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. A. Crowder, M. R.W. Dawson, and D. R.W. Wylie
Temporal Frequency and Velocity-Like Tuning in the Pigeon Accessory Optic System
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 1829 - 1841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. E. Angelaki and J. D. Dickman
Premotor Neurons Encode Torsional Eye Velocity during Smooth-Pursuit Eye Movements
J. Neurosci., April 1, 2003; 23(7): 2971 - 2979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. M. Merfeld and L. H. Zupan
Neural Processing of Gravitoinertial Cues in Humans. III. Modeling Tilt and Translation Responses
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2002; 87(2): 819 - 833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. R. W. Wylie and B. J. Frost
Complex Spike Activity of Purkinje Cells in the Ventral Uvula and Nodulus of Pigeons in Response to Translational Optic Flow
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 1999; 81(1): 256 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. R. W. Wylie and B. J. Frost
Responses of Neurons in the Nucleus of the Basal Optic Root to Translational and Rotational Flowfields
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 1999; 81(1): 267 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online