Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 71, Issue 1 150-160, Copyright © 1994 by APS

ARTICLES

Topographic patterns of responsiveness to odorants in the rat olfactory epithelium

A. Mackay-Sim and S. Kesteven
Faculty of Science and Technology, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.

1. Regional differences in odorant-induced responsiveness of the rat olfactory epithelium were measured via electrophysiological recordings [negative component of electro-olfactogram (Veog(-)) made from the surface of the olfactory epithelium on the nasal septum]. The nasal septum provided a flat surface from which multiple recordings could be made. 2. Veog(-)s were recorded from a standardized grid of 16 sites. This grid of recording sites extended over most of the surface of the olfactory epithelium on the nasal septum. 3. Twenty-one animals were tested for their responses to seven odorants. The animals were divided into three groups, each of which was tested with two different odorants plus amyl acetate, which provided a comparison between the groups. 4. For each odorant in each animal, topographic maps of relative responsiveness were derived to test whether odorants elicited different patterns of responses in the same individual. Topographic maps of responsiveness were derived also for the animal groups to test for the generality of the form of the maps for different odorants. Response latencies were also measured for each odorant at each recording site. 5. All individuals showed different topographic patterns of responses to the three test odorants. For most odorants, the location of the most responsive site was similar in all animals. In different animals the topographic maps for the same odorant were remarkably similar. Topographic maps for the odorants were all different from one another. 6. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that odorant quality is encoded in the differential spatial distribution of receptor cells whose differences in responsiveness appear to be distributed as a continuum across the epithelium. The results establish for a mammalian species what was previously reported in amphibians. These differences are presumed to be due to differential expression of odorant receptor proteins. 7. The mean response latency was 32 ms. This period was similar for all odorants, all animals, and all recording sites and was independent of Veog(-) amplitude. It is concluded that diffusion through the mucus contributed approximately 6 ms to the latency of onset of the responses to these odorants.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Lapid, H.-S. Seo, B. Schuster, E. Schneidman, Y. Roth, D. Harel, N. Sobel, and T. Hummel Odorant Concentration Dependence in Electroolfactograms Recorded From the Human Olfactory Epithelium J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2009; 102(4): 2121 - 2130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Scott, H. P. Acevedo, and L. Sherrill Effects of Concentration and Sniff Flow Rate on the Rat Electroolfactogram Chem Senses, July 1, 2006; 31(6): 581 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Scott Sniffing and Spatiotemporal Coding in Olfaction Chem Senses, February 1, 2006; 31(2): 119 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Tian and M. Ma Molecular Organization of the Olfactory Septal Organ J. Neurosci., September 22, 2004; 24(38): 8383 - 8390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. L. Iwema, H. Fang, D. B. Kurtz, S. L. Youngentob, and J. E. Schwob Odorant Receptor Expression Patterns Are Restored in Lesion-Recovered Rat Olfactory Epithelium J. Neurosci., January 14, 2004; 24(2): 356 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L. Youngentob, P. F. Kent, and F. L. Margolis OMP Gene Deletion Results in an Alteration in Odorant-Induced Mucosal Activity Patterns J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2003; 90(6): 3864 - 3873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.A. Chaput EOG Responses in Anesthetized Freely Breathing Rats Chem Senses, December 1, 2000; 25(6): 695 - 701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P.E. Scott-Johnson, D. Blakley, and J.W. Scott Effects of Air Flow on Rat Electroolfactogram Chem Senses, December 1, 2000; 25(6): 761 - 768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Scott, T. Brierley, and F. H. Schmidt Chemical Determinants of the Rat Electro-Olfactogram J. Neurosci., June 15, 2000; 20(12): 4721 - 4731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Scott and T. Brierley A Functional Map in Rat Olfactory Epithelium Chem Senses, December 1, 1999; 24(6): 679 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Zhao, L. Ivic, J. M. Otaki, M. Hashimoto, K. Mikoshiba, and S. Firestein Functional Expression of a Mammalian Odorant Receptor Science, January 9, 1998; 279(5348): 237 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. W. Scott, D. E. Shannon, J. Charpentier, L. M. Davis, and C. Kaplan Spatially Organized Response Zones in Rat Olfactory Epithelium J Neurophysiol, April 1, 1997; 77(4): 1950 - 1962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Weth, W. Nadler, and S. Korsching Nested expression domains for odorant receptors in zebrafish olfactory epithelium PNAS, November 12, 1996; 93(23): 13321 - 13326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Ma and G. M. Shepherd Functional mosaic organization of mouse olfactory receptor neurons PNAS, November 7, 2000; 97(23): 12869 - 12874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]