Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 71, Issue 1 330-346, Copyright © 1994 by APS

ARTICLES

Receptive-field maps of correlated discharge between pairs of neurons in the cat's visual cortex

G. M. Ghose, I. Ohzawa and R. D. Freeman
Group in Biophysics, School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley 94720.

1. To investigate the functional significance of temporally correlated discharge between nearby cells in the visual cortex, we obtained receptive-field maps of correlated discharge for 68 cell pairs in kittens and cats. Discharge from cell pairs was measured by a single extracellular electrode. A reverse correlation procedure was used to relate neural discharge to particular stimuli within a random sequence of briefly flashed bright and dark bars. Bicellular receptive fields (BRFs) were mapped by applying reverse correlation to approximately synchronous discharge from two cells. Unicellular receptive fields (URFs) were simultaneously mapped by separately applying reverse correlation to the discharge of each cell. 2. The receptive fields of the two neurons within each pair were initially studied by varying the orientation and spatial frequency of drifting sinusoidal gratings. After these tests a random sequence of appropriately oriented bars was used to evoke discharge suitable for reverse correlation analysis. For most cell pairs, the temporal pattern or strength of correlated discharge produced by such stimulation is different from that observed with stimulation by sinusoidal gratings. This indicates that visually evoked correlated discharge between nearby cells is stimulus dependent. 3. BRFs were classified according to their pattern of spatial sensitivity into three groups that roughly correspond to the single-cell receptive-field types of the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN; center-surround) and visual cortex (simple and complex). These classifications were compared with the receptive-field types of the single cells within each pair. LGN-type and simple-type BRFs were only seen for pairs in which at least one of the cells was simple. Conversely, complex-type BRFs were only seen for pairs in which at least one of the cells was complex. 4. Because the reverse correlation procedure can be used to characterize the spatiotemporal receptive-field structure of simple cells, we were able to compare both the spatial and temporal properties associated with the URFs and BRFs of simple cell pairs. The spatiotemporal structure of the BRF of a simple-cell pair can largely be predicted on the basis of the two URFs. Although this prediction suggests the possibility that BRFs are stimulus artifacts, a shuffle procedure, in which multiple repetitions of random sequences were presented, verifies the neural origin of BRFs. BRFs emerge from specific neural pathways and are not simply a consequence of unicellular response preferences. 5. Five measures were derived from the reverse correlation analysis of simple-cell receptive fields: width, duration, optimal spatial and temporal frequency, and optimal velocity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. M. Samonds, Z. Zhou, M. R. Bernard, and A. B. Bonds Synchronous Activity in Cat Visual Cortex Encodes Collinear and Cocircular Contours J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2006; 95(4): 2602 - 2616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Freed Quantal Encoding of Information in a Retinal Ganglion Cell J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2005; 94(2): 1048 - 1056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Tomita and J. J. Eggermont Cross-Correlation and Joint Spectro-Temporal Receptive Field Properties in Auditory Cortex J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2005; 93(1): 378 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Menz and R. D. Freeman Functional Connectivity of Disparity-Tuned Neurons in the Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 1794 - 1807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. Ghose, T. Yang, and J. H. R. Maunsell Physiological Correlates of Perceptual Learning in Monkey V1 and V2 J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2002; 87(4): 1867 - 1888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Krahe, G. Kreiman, F. Gabbiani, C. Koch, and W. Metzner Stimulus Encoding and Feature Extraction by Multiple Sensory Neurons J. Neurosci., March 15, 2002; 22(6): 2374 - 2382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Miller, M. A. Escabi, and C. E. Schreiner Feature Selectivity and Interneuronal Cooperation in the Thalamocortical System J. Neurosci., October 15, 2001; 21(20): 8136 - 8144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. C. DeAngelis, G. M. Ghose, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman Functional Micro-Organization of Primary Visual Cortex: Receptive Field Analysis of Nearby Neurons J. Neurosci., May 15, 1999; 19(10): 4046 - 4064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Eggermont and J. E. Mossop Azimuth Coding in Primary Auditory Cortex of the Cat. I. Spike Synchrony Versus Spike Count Representations J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1998; 80(4): 2133 - 2150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Prut, E. Vaadia, H. Bergman, I. Haalman, H. Slovin, and M. Abeles Spatiotemporal Structure of Cortical Activity: Properties and Behavioral Relevance J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1998; 79(6): 2857 - 2874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Meister, L. Lagnado, and D. A. Baylor Concerted Signaling by Retinal Ganglion Cells Science, November 17, 1995; 270(5239): 1207 - 1210. [Abstract] [PDF]