JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 71: 59-78, 1994;
0022-3077/94 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (30)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, X.
Right arrow Articles by Sachs, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, X.
Right arrow Articles by Sachs, M. B.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 71, Issue 1 59-78, Copyright © 1994 by APS


ARTICLES

Neural encoding of single-formant stimuli in the cat. II. Responses of anteroventral cochlear nucleus units

X. Wang and M. B. Sachs
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

1. We have studied responses of anteroventral cochlear nucleus (AVCN) units to single-formant stimuli (SFS), in an effort to make quantitative comparisons with responses observed in auditory-nerve fibers (ANFs) to the same stimuli (Wang and Sachs 1993) and to reveal some of the signal processing mechanisms at the AVCN. Single-unit recordings and subsequent analyses were performed on each type of commonly recorded units, namely primarylike (Pri), primarylike with notch (PN), sustained chopper (ChS), transient chopper (ChT), and onset chopper (OnC), as well as a few onset (On) units, from the AVCN in anesthetized cats. The responses were obtained at a wide range of sound levels and at a frequency range of 1-10 kHz. Modulation in the envelopes of discharge patterns was quantified by a measure called modulation depth. 2. At moderate to high sound levels, most AVCN units were found to have enhanced modulation depth compared with that of ANFs, although the degree of enhancement varies among different types. All AVCN units, except Pri type, showed an enhancement in modulation depth over that of the highest of ANFs at moderate to high sound levels in the order of (from the highest to the lowest) On, OnC, ChT/PN, and ChS. Specifically, 1) modulation depth in Pri units was comparable to that of high spontaneous rate (SR) ANFs at low sound levels and to that of low/medium SR ANFs at high sound levels (in dB SPL). When sound level was normalized by unit threshold, Pri units, on average, exhibited only limited enhancement in envelope modulation at high sound levels (> 80 dB re threshold); 2) PN units showed substantially enhanced modulation depth over that of all SR groups of ANFs at moderate to high sound levels in dB SPL or dB re threshold scales; 3) significant enhancement in modulation depth was seen in both ChS and ChT units, with a slightly higher modulation depth in ChT type across sound levels (in dB SPL or dB re threshold); 4) modulation depth of OnC units was higher than those of primary-like (Pri and PN) and chopper (ChS and ChT) units at a wide range of sound levels; 5) responses from a limited sample of On units showed the highest modulation depth among all types of AVCN units. 3. Detailed analysis revealed that the enhanced modulation depth in the responses of AVCN units is the result of increased envelope peak height and decreased envelope minimum, relative to those of ANFs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. G. Paolini, J. C. Clarey, K. Needham, and G. M. Clark
Fast Inhibition Alters First Spike Timing in Auditory Brainstem Neurons
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2004; 92(4): 2615 - 2621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
P. X. JORIS, C. E. SCHREINER, and A. REES
Neural Processing of Amplitude-Modulated Sounds
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2004; 84(2): 541 - 577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. S. Rothman and P. B. Manis
Differential Expression of Three Distinct Potassium Currents in the Ventral Cochlear Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 3070 - 3082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. Wiegrebe and I. M. Winter
Temporal Representation of Iterated Rippled Noise as a Function of Delay and Sound Level in the Ventral Cochlear Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2001; 85(3): 1206 - 1219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. P. Shofner
Responses of Cochlear Nucleus Units in the Chinchilla to Iterated Rippled Noises: Analysis of Neural Autocorrelograms
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1999; 81(6): 2662 - 2674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. J. May, G. S. L. Prell, and M. B. Sachs
Vowel Representations in the Ventral Cochlear Nucleus of the Cat: Effects of Level, Background Noise, and Behavioral State
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 1998; 79(4): 1755 - 1767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. J. Ferragamo, N. L. Golding, and D. Oertel
Synaptic Inputs to Stellate Cells in the Ventral Cochlear Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 1998; 79(1): 51 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. X. Joris and T. C. T. Yin
Envelope Coding in the Lateral Superior Olive. III. Comparison With Afferent Pathways
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 1998; 79(1): 253 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online