JN Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 71: 1646-1660, 1994;
0022-3077/94 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernard, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Besson, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bernard, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Besson, J. M.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 71, Issue 5 1646-1660, Copyright © 1994 by APS


ARTICLES

The parabrachial area: electrophysiological evidence for an involvement in visceral nociceptive processes

J. F. Bernard, G. F. Huang and J. M. Besson
Unite de Recherches de Physiopharmacologie du Systeme Nerveux, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale U 161, Paris, France.

1. Neurons (n = 142) were recorded with extracellular micropipettes in the parabrachial (PB) area, in the anesthetized rat, some of them being antidromically driven from the centralis nucleus of the amygdala (Ce). The spontaneous activity of these neurons was low, (10th percentile < median frequency < 90th percentile; 0.01 < 0.3 < 11 Hz), and the activity of a very high proportion of the PB neurons (89%, 127/142) were affected by mechanical or thermal cutaneous stimuli almost exclusively in the noxious range; most of them were activated and received inputs from A delta and/or C fibers. 2. A majority of the PB neurons (66%, 93/142) were affected by visceral stimuli (bradykinin intraperitoneal and/or colorectal distension), almost exclusively in the noxious range; all of them (except one) were also affected by cutaneous noxious stimuli. The remaining neurons not affected by these visceral stimuli were only activated by cutaneous noxious stimuli (n = 35) or completely unresponsive (n = 14; i.e., only 10% of the whole population). 3. Thirty-five percent (49/142) of the whole population of PB neurons responded to bradykinin intraperitoneal and/or to strong colorectal distension with an intense and sustained increase of discharge. The response to bradykinin and to colorectal distension was often dissociated, i.e., the activation was often produced by only one of the stimuli the other being ineffective or inhibitory. The intensity of responses to visceral noxious stimuli was between 5-45 Hz with a mean value of 20 +/- 2 (SE) Hz (n = 49). The visceral activated neurons exhibited a clear capacity to encode the colorectal distension in noxious range: 1) the stimulus-response function was almost always positive and monotonic; 2) as for the individual curves, the slope of the mean curve progressively increased up to the highest interval of pressure tested (100-125 mmHg); and 3) the threshold for neuronal response to colorectal distension was between 25-100 mmHg with a mean pressure threshold of 56 +/- 24 (SD) mmHg (n = 19). Viscerosomatic convergence was observed for 84% of these neurons: they were also activated by thermal and/or mechanical cutaneous noxious stimuli while only 16% of them were activated only by visceral noxious stimulation. 4. Thirty-one percent (44/142) of the whole population of PB neurons were inhibited by both strong colorectal distension and intraperitoneal bradykinin (82%) or only by one of the stimuli being unresponsive to the other (18%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. Boscan, M. Dutschmann, H. Herbert, and J. F. R. Paton
Neurokininergic Mechanism within the Lateral Crescent Nucleus of the Parabrachial Complex Participates in the Heart-Rate Response to Nociception
J. Neurosci., February 9, 2005; 25(6): 1412 - 1420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
V. Neugebauer and W. Li
Processing of Nociceptive Mechanical and Thermal Information in Central Amygdala Neurons With Knee-Joint Input
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 103 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
J.-P. Baird, J. B. Travers, and S. P. Travers
Parametric analysis of gastric distension responses in the parabrachial nucleus
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2001; 281(5): R1568 - R1580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. Bester, V. Chapman, J.-M. Besson, and J.-F. Bernard
Physiological Properties of the Lamina I Spinoparabrachial Neurons in the Rat
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2000; 83(4): 2239 - 2259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
L. F. Hayward and R. B. Felder
Electrophysiological properties of rat lateral parabrachial neurons in vitro
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 1999; 276(3): R696 - R706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. Straus, M. Zelter, J.-P. Derenne, B. Pidoux, J.-C. Willer, and T. Similowski
Putative projection of phrenic afferents to the limbic cortex in humans studied with cerebral-evoked potentials
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 1997; 82(2): 480 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online