JN AJP: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 71: 1826-1834, 1994;
0022-3077/94 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M. C.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 71, Issue 5 1826-1834, Copyright © 1994 by APS

ARTICLES

The antidromic compound action potential of the auditory nerve

M. C. Brown
Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

1. The antidromic compound action potential (ACAP) of the auditory nerve was evoked by shocks to the auditory nerve root and recorded at the round window of the cochlea in anesthetized guinea pigs. The goal of this study was to determine the characteristics of the ACAP and compare these characteristics with those of the orthodromic, sound-evoked compound action potential (CAP). 2. The ACAP consists of an initial complex of a positive peak (p1) followed by a negative peak (n1). In contrast, the CAP consists of a negative peak (N1) followed by a positive peak (P1). These differences in waveform are likely due to the differences in conduction direction, antidromic for the ACAP vs. orthodromic for the CAP. 3. After the initial complex, the ACAP has a second complex of peaks (p2, n2) at a latency of approximately 1 ms; this complex is much smaller in amplitude than the initial complex (p1, n1). It is likely that the initial ACAP complex reflects firing of auditory-nerve fibers whereas the second complex reflects firing of neurons further centrally, perhaps in the cochlear nucleus, that are activated by orthodromic firing of auditory-nerve fibers. 4. Experiments with shock pairs are consistent with the idea that for auditory nerve fibers, the absolute refractory period is < 0.5 ms, and the relative refractory period is between 0.5 and at least 5 ms. 5. Experiments with click-shock pairs indicate that a shock interferes with the response to a click when the click and shock are given at about the same time.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
P. Heil, H. Neubauer, D. R. F. Irvine, and M. Brown
Spontaneous Activity of Auditory-Nerve Fibers: Insights into Stochastic Processes at Ribbon Synapses
J. Neurosci., August 1, 2007; 27(31): 8457 - 8474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online