Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 71, Issue 5 1907-1916, Copyright © 1994 by APS

ARTICLES

Influence of stimulus level on acoustic motion-direction sensitivity in barn owl midbrain neurons

H. Wagner, T. Trinath and D. Kautz
Max-Planck-Institut fur biologische Kybernetik, Tubingen, Germany.

1. Many neurons in the owl's midbrain are able to discriminate by their responses the motion of an acoustic source in one direction, the preferred direction, from the motion of the source in the opposite direction, the null direction. This differential response can be understood by the action of an acoustic motion detector. However, the motion detector would work in an effective way only if the motion direction-sensitive responses of a cell were largely independent of stimulus level. 2. We investigated the level dependence of acoustic motion sensitivity in midbrain neurons with standard extracellular recording techniques. We used an apparent motion paradigm with sounds moving clockwise or counterclockwise in the horizontal plane or stationary sounds for stimulation from free-field speakers. In most cases we added a constant level of background noise to the stimuli having a variable level. Thus we could analyze the responses as a function of the signal-to-noise ratio. 3. Moving and stationary sounds yielded similar response thresholds and similar dynamic ranges. 4. When the background level was changed the response threshold changed accordingly, so that the response threshold always occurred at a constant signal-to-noise ratio independent of background level. 5. The preferred direction of all cells was independent of stimulus level and some 22 percent of the cells showed a directional bias of their response at threshold. In no cell was a change in the preferred direction observed when stimulus level was varied. Typically, however, the motion direction sensitivity, measured by a signed directionality index, was not maximal at threshold. However, the dynamic range, i.e., the range of stimulus levels over which motion direction sensitivity changed, was < or = 20 dB in most cases. Therefore these cells are indeed able to encode motion direction largely independently of stimulus level. 6. We discuss the data within the framework of the acoustic motion detector mentioned above and with respect to earlier reports on acoustic motion sensitivity in the owl and other animals.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Wagner, A. Asadollahi, P. Bremen, F. Endler, K. Vonderschen, and M. von Campenhausen Distribution of Interaural Time Difference in the Barn Owl's Inferior Colliculus in the Low- and High-Frequency Ranges J. Neurosci., April 11, 2007; 27(15): 4191 - 4200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. Malone, B. H. Scott, and M. N. Semple Context-Dependent Adaptive Coding of Interaural Phase Disparity in the Auditory Cortex of Awake Macaques J. Neurosci., June 1, 2002; 22(11): 4625 - 4638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Kautz and H. Wagner GABAergic Inhibition Influences Auditory Motion-Direction Sensitivity in Barn Owls J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1998; 80(1): 172 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]