|
|
||||||||
Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 71, Issue 6 2194-2216, Copyright © 1994 by APS
ARTICLES |
F. K. Samson, P. Barone, J. C. Clarey and T. J. Imig
Department of Physiology, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City 66160-7401.
1. Single-unit recordings were carried out in primary auditory cortex (AI) of barbiturate-anesthetized cats. Observations were based on a sample of 131 high-best-frequency (> 5 kHz), azimuth-sensitive neurons. These were identified by their responses to a set of noise bursts, presented in the free field, that varied in azimuth and sound-pressure level (SPL). Each azimuth-sensitive neuron responded well to some levels at certain azimuths, but did not respond well to any level at other azimuths. 2. Unilateral ear plugging was used to infer each neuron's response to monaural stimulation. Ear plugs, produced by injecting a plastic ear mold compound into the external ear, attenuated sound reaching the tympanic membrane by 25-70 dB. The azimuth tuning of a large proportion of the sample (62/131), referred to as binaural directional (BD), was completely dependent upon binaural stimulation because with one ear plugged, these cells were insensitive to azimuth (either responded well at all azimuths or failed to respond at any azimuth) or in a few cases exhibited striking changes in location of azimuth function peaks. This report describes patterns of monaural responses and binaural interactions exhibited by BD neurons and relates them to each cell's azimuth and level tuning. The response of BD cells to ear plugging is consistent with the hypothesis that they derive azimuth tuning from interaural level differences present in noise bursts. Another component of the sample consisted of monaural directional (27/131) cells that derived azimuth tuning in part or entirely from monaural spectral cues. Cells in the remaining portion of the sample (42/131) responded too unreliably to permit specific conclusions. 3. Binaural interactions were inferred by statistical comparison of a cell's responses to monaural (unilateral plug) and binaural (no plug) stimulation. A larger binaural response than either monaural response was taken as evidence for binaural facilitation. A smaller binaural than monaural response was taken as evidence for binaural inhibition. Binaural facilitation was exhibited by 65% (40/62) of the BD sample (facilitatory cells). Many of these exhibited mixed interactions, i.e., binaural facilitation occurred in response to some azimuth-level combinations, and binaural inhibition to others. Binaural inhibition in the absence of binaural facilitation occurred in 35% (22/62) of the BD sample, a majority of which were EI cells, so called because they received excitatory (E) input from one ear (excitatory ear) and inhibitory (I) input from the other (inhibitory ear). One cell that exhibited binaural inhibition received excitatory input from each ear.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Zhang, K. T. Nakamoto, and L. M. Kitzes Binaural Interaction Revisited in the Cat Primary Auditory Cortex J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 101 - 117. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Poirier, F. K. Samson, and T. J. Imig Spectral Shape Sensitivity Contributes to the Azimuth Tuning of Neurons in the Cat's Inferior Colliculus J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2003; 89(5): 2760 - 2777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Reale, R. L. Jenison, and J. F. Brugge Directional Sensitivity of Neurons in the Primary Auditory (AI) Cortex: Effects of Sound-Source Intensity Level J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2003; 89(2): 1024 - 1038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. K. Samson, P. Barone, W. A. Irons, J. C. Clarey, P. Poirier, and T. J. Imig Directionality Derived From Differential Sensitivity to Monaural and Binaural Cues in the Cat's Medial Geniculate Body J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2000; 84(3): 1330 - 1345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. H. Recanzone, D. C. Guard, M. L. Phan, and T.-I K. Su Correlation Between the Activity of Single Auditory Cortical Neurons and Sound-Localization Behavior in the Macaque Monkey J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2000; 83(5): 2723 - 2739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Imig, N. G. Bibikov, P. Poirier, and F. K. Samson Directionality Derived From Pinna-Cue Spectral Notches in Cat Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2000; 83(2): 907 - 925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Delgutte, P. X. Joris, R. Y. Litovsky, and T. C. T. Yin Receptive Fields and Binaural Interactions for Virtual-Space Stimuli in the Cat Inferior Colliculus J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1999; 81(6): 2833 - 2851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Brugge, R. A. Reale, and J. E. Hind Spatial Receptive Fields of Primary Auditory Cortical Neurons in Quiet and in the Presence of Continuous Background Noise J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1998; 80(5): 2417 - 2432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Eggermont and J. E. Mossop Azimuth Coding in Primary Auditory Cortex of the Cat. I. Spike Synchrony Versus Spike Count Representations J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1998; 80(4): 2133 - 2150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Imig, P. Poirier, W. A. Irons, and F. K. Samson Monaural Spectral Contrast Mechanism for Neural Sensitivity to Sound Direction in the Medial Geniculate Body of the Cat J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1997; 78(5): 2754 - 2771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Brugge, R. A. Reale, and J. E. Hind The Structure of Spatial Receptive Fields of Neurons in Primary Auditory Cortex of the Cat J. Neurosci., July 15, 1996; 16(14): 4420 - 4437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |