JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 72: 742-753, 1994;
0022-3077/94 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Okada, Y. C.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Okada, Y. C.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, C.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 72, Issue 2 742-753, Copyright © 1994 by APS


ARTICLES

Origin of the apparent tissue conductivity in the molecular and granular layers of the in vitro turtle cerebellum and the interpretation of current source-density analysis

Y. C. Okada, J. C. Huang, M. E. Rice, D. Tranchina and C. Nicholson
Magnetophysiology Laboratory, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Albuquerque, 87108.

1. We determined the origin of the apparent tissue conductivity (sigma 2) of the turtle cerebellum in vitro. 2. Application of a current with a known current density (J) along the longitudinal axis of a conductivity cell produced an electric field in the cerebellum suspended in the cell. The measured electric field (E) perpendicular to the cerebellar surface indicated a significant inhomogeneity in sigma a (= J/E) with a major discontinuity between the molecular layer (0.25 +/- 0.05 S/m, mean +/- SD) and granular layers (0.15 +/- 0.03 S/m) (n = 39). 3. This inhomogeneity was more pronounced after anoxic depolarization. The value of sigma a decreased to 0.11 +/- 0.03 and 0.040 +/- 0.008 S/m in the molecular and granular layers, respectively. The ratio of sigma a S in the two layers increased from 1.67 in the normoxic condition to 2.75 after anoxic depolarization. 4. This difference in sigma a across the two layers was present within the range of frequencies (DC to 10 kHz) studied where the phase of sigma a was small (less than +/- 2 degrees) and therefore sigma a was ohmic. 5. The inhomogeneity in sigma a was in part due to an inhomogeneity in the extracellular conductivity (sigma e) as determined from the extracellular diffusion of ionophoresed tetramethylammonium. Like sigma a, the value of sigma e was also higher in the molecular layer (0.165 S/m) than in the granular layer (0.097 S/m). The inhomogeneity in sigma e was due to a smaller tortuosity and a larger extracellular volume fraction in the molecular layer compared with the granular layer. 6. sigma a was, however, consistently higher, by approximately 50%, than sigma e. A core conductor model of the cerebellum indicated that these discrepancies between sigma a and sigma e were attributable to additional conductivity produced by a passage of the longitudinal applied current through the intracellular space of Purkinje cells and ependymal glial cells, with the glial compartment playing the dominant role. Cells with a long process and a short space constant such as the ependymal glia evidently enhance the effective "extracellular" conductivity by serving as intracellular conduits for the applied current. The result implies that the effective sigma e may be larger than sigma e for neuronally generated currents in the turtle cerebellum because the space constant for Purkinje cells is several times greater than that for the ependymal glia and consequently Purkinje cell-generated currents travel over a long distance relative to the space constant of glial cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
E. Sykova and C. Nicholson
Diffusion in Brain Extracellular Space
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2008; 88(4): 1277 - 1340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. P. Savtchenko and D. A. Rusakov
The optimal height of the synaptic cleft
PNAS, February 6, 2007; 104(6): 1823 - 1828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Ariel
Latencies of Climbing Fiber Inputs to Turtle Cerebellar Cortex
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2005; 93(2): 1042 - 1054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
G. G. Somjen
Mechanisms of Spreading Depression and Hypoxic Spreading Depression-Like Depolarization
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2001; 81(3): 1065 - 1096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. Varona, J. M. Ibarz, L. Lopez-Aguado, and O. Herreras
Macroscopic and Subcellular Factors Shaping Population Spikes
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2000; 83(4): 2192 - 2208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Muller and G. G. Somjen
Intrinsic Optical Signals in Rat Hippocampal Slices During Hypoxia-Induced Spreading Depression-Like Depolarization
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1999; 82(4): 1818 - 1831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online