JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 72: 2026-2030, 1994;
0022-3077/94 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gentilucci, M.
Right arrow Articles by Negrotti, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gentilucci, M.
Right arrow Articles by Negrotti, A.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 72, Issue 4 2026-2030, Copyright © 1994 by APS


ARTICLES

Dissociation between perception and visuomotor transformation during reproduction of remembered distances

M. Gentilucci and A. Negrotti
Institute of Human Physiology, Parma, Italy.

1. In complete darkness subjects were presented with two visual stimuli whose distance was randomly varied. The subjects were required to reproduce the interstimulus remembered distance in two conditions. In one condition (reproduction by pointing) they pointed to a virtual position in space. In the other condition (visual reproduction) they used two other visual stimuli. One of them was fixed, and the other could be manually moved. Constant and variable errors were measured in the two conditions. 2. Constant error varied between the two conditions. In the pointing task subjects slightly overestimated the shorter distances, and underestimated the longer ones. During visual reproduction, they consistently overestimated all distances, and the error of overestimation tended to increase with distance. Statistical comparison between the errors in the two conditions was significant. Variable error increased with distance in both conditions, but did not show any significant difference between the two tasks. 3. The results of the present experiment support the hypothesis that perception and visuo-motor transformation are two separate processes in which the same object attributes are independently analysed. However, the finding that variable error did not change between the two tasks suggests that some stages are common to the two processes.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. Vindras, M. Desmurget, C. Prablanc, and P. Viviani
Pointing Errors Reflect Biases in the Perception of the InitialHand Position
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1998; 79(6): 3290 - 3294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online