Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 72, Issue 5 2134-2150, Copyright © 1994 by APS

ARTICLES

Envelope-responsive neurons in areas 17 and 18 of cat

Y. X. Zhou and C. L. Baker Jr
Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

1. Single cortical neurons are known to respond to visual stimuli containing Fourier components only in a narrow range of spatial frequencies. This investigation demonstrates that some neurons in cat area 17 and 18 can also respond to certain stimuli that have no Fourier components inside the cell's luminance spatial frequency passband. 2. To study such "non-Fourier" responses, we used envelope stimuli that consisted of a high-spatial-frequency sinusoidal luminance grating (carrier) whose contrast was modulated by a low-spatial frequency sine wave (envelope). There was no Fourier component at the apparent periodicity of the envelope spatial frequency. However, some cells responded to such a "phantom" component of the envelope modulation when it fell inside the cell's luminance spatial frequency passband while all the real Fourier components in the stimuli were outside. 3. We conducted extensive control experiments to eliminate the possibility of producing artifactual responses to the envelope stimuli due to any small residual nonlinearity of the z-linearized CRT screen. The control experiments included 1) testing of screen linearity to ensure that the effect from the residual screen nonlinearity was no larger than the sensitivity level of visual responses and 2) comparing the responses to envelope stimuli with the responses to the equivalent contrast of the artifact produced by the screen nonlinearity. All these control experiments indicated that any effect of screen nonlinearity did not contribute significantly to the neural envelope responses. 4. We performed a statistical analysis to obtain an index of relative strength of envelope responses for each cell and to objectively classify cells as "envelope-responsive" or "non-envelope-responsive."(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. P. Issa, A. Rosenberg, and T. R. Husson Models and Measurements of Functional Maps in V1 J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2008; 99(6): 2745 - 2754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Hayashi, K. Miura, H. Tabata, and K. Kawano Eye Movements in Response to Dichoptic Motion: Evidence for a Parallel-Hierarchical Structure of Visual Motion Processing in Primates J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2329 - 2346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Nishimoto, T. Ishida, and I. Ohzawa Receptive field properties of neurons in the early visual cortex revealed by local spectral reverse correlation. J. Neurosci., March 22, 2006; 26(12): 3269 - 3280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Larsson, M. S. Landy, and D. J. Heeger Orientation-Selective Adaptation to First- and Second-Order Patterns in Human Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 862 - 881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.'y. Nishida, Y. Sasaki, I. Murakami, T. Watanabe, and R. B. H. Tootell Neuroimaging of Direction-Selective Mechanisms for Second-Order Motion J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 3242 - 3254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Seiffert, D. C. Somers, A. M. Dale, and R. B.H. Tootell Functional MRI Studies of Human Visual Motion Perception: Texture, Luminance, Attention and After-effects Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2003; 13(4): 340 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Mareschal and C. L. Baker Jr. Temporal and Spatial Response to Second-Order Stimuli in Cat Area 18  J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1998; 80(6): 2811 - 2823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]