JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 72: 2334-2359, 1994;
0022-3077/94 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raggio, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Schreiner, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raggio, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Schreiner, C. E.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 72, Issue 5 2334-2359, Copyright © 1994 by APS


ARTICLES

Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. I. Intensity dependence of firing rate and response latency

M. W. Raggio and C. E. Schreiner
Coleman Memorial Laboratory, W. M. Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience, Department of Otolaryngology, University of California at San Francisco 94143-0732.

1. Responses of neurons in primary auditory cortex (AI) of the barbiturate anesthetized adult cat were studied using cochlear stimulation with electrical and acoustic stimuli. Acoustic stimulation of the ear ipsilateral to the studied cortical hemisphere with brief biphasic clicks was compared with electrical stimulation of the contralateral cochlea with brief biphasic electrical pulses delivered via a feline cochlear prosthesis. The contralateral ear was deafened immediately before implantation of the cochlear prosthesis. The feline cochlear prosthesis consisted of four bipolar electrode pairs and was placed in the scala tympani. Two bipolar electrode conditions were used for stimulation: one near radial pair with electrode spacing of approximately 0.5 mm, and one longitudinal pair with electrode spacing of approximately 6 mm. 2. The firing rates obtained from single- and multiple-neuron recordings were measured as a function of stimulus intensity for single electrical and acoustic pulses. Resulting rate/level functions were characterized by a fast growing low-level segment and a more slowly growing, saturating, or decreasing high-level segment. The slopes of these two segments as well as the stimulus level and firing rate at the juncture of these two segments (the transition point) provide a complete characterization of the response magnitude behavior as a function of stimulus intensity. 3. The main characteristics of rate/level functions obtained with electrical and acoustic cochlear stimulation were quite similar. However, for any given neuron, differences in the primary growth behavior, such as monotonic or nonmonotonic growth, could be observed between the different stimulation modes. 4. Response latencies from single- and multiple-neuron recordings were obtained as a function of stimulus intensity for electrical and acoustic pulses. Resulting latency/level functions were characterized by a rapidly decreasing low-level segment and a more slowly decreasing high-level segment. The slopes of these two segments as well as the stimulus level and response latency at the juncture of these two segments (the transition point) provide a complete characterization of the response latency behavior as a function of stimulus intensity. Transition point levels for the rate/level function and the latency/level were nearly identical. 5. The characteristic latency behavior for each neuronal response was found to be very similar for acoustic and electrical stimulation. Correlation analysis revealed a close relationship between latency parameters of the two electrical stimulation conditions, a weaker relationship between the longitudinal electrical and the acoustic conditions, and the weakest relationship between the radial electrical and acoustic conditions. 6. Correlation analysis for rate and latency parameters revealed several relationships between these response aspects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. H. Lim and D. J. Anderson
Auditory Cortical Responses to Electrical Stimulation of the Inferior Colliculus: Implications for an Auditory Midbrain Implant
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 975 - 988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. W. Raggio and C. E. Schreiner
Neuronal Responses in Cat Primary Auditory Cortex to Electrical Cochlear Stimulation: IV. Activation Pattern for Sinusoidal Stimulation
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 3190 - 3204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Z. Xiao and N. Suga
Reorganization of the cochleotopic map in the bat's auditory system by inhibition
PNAS, November 26, 2002; 99(24): 15743 - 15748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. A. Bierer and J. C. Middlebrooks
Auditory Cortical Images of Cochlear-Implant Stimuli: Dependence on Electrode Configuration
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 478 - 492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Vollmer, R. E. Beitel, and R. L. Snyder
Auditory Detection and Discrimination in Deaf Cats: Psychophysical and Neural Thresholds for Intracochlear Electrical Signals
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2001; 86(5): 2330 - 2343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. Kral, R. Hartmann, J. Tillein, S. Heid, and R. Klinke
Congenital Auditory Deprivation Reduces Synaptic Activity within the Auditory Cortex in a Layer-specific Manner
Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2000; 10(7): 714 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. E. Beitel, R. L. Snyder, C. E. Schreiner, M. W. Raggio, and P. A. Leake
Electrical Cochlear Stimulation in the Deaf Cat: Comparisons Between Psychophysical and Central Auditory Neuronal Thresholds
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2000; 83(4): 2145 - 2162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. W. Raggio and C. E. Schreiner
Neuronal Responses in Cat Primary Auditory Cortex to Electrical Cochlear Stimulation. III. Activation Patterns in Short- and Long-Term Deafness
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1999; 82(6): 3506 - 3526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. Klinke, A. Kral, S. Heid, J. Tillein, and R. Hartmann
Recruitment of the Auditory Cortex in Congenitally Deaf Cats by Long-Term Cochlear Electrostimulation
Science, September 10, 1999; 285(5434): 1729 - 1733.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. J. Eggermont
Representation of Spectral and Temporal Sound Features in Three Cortical Fields of the Cat. Similarities Outweigh Differences
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1998; 80(5): 2743 - 2764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online