JN Miami Valley Hospital
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 72: 2609-2616, 1994;
0022-3077/94 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fern, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ransom, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fern, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ransom, B. R.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 72, Issue 6 2609-2616, Copyright © 1994 by APS


ARTICLES

Modulation of anoxic injury in CNS white matter by adenosine and interaction between adenosine and GABA

R. Fern, S. G. Waxman and B. R. Ransom
Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven 06510.

1. We examined the role of adenosine in the development of anoxic injury in a CNS white matter tract, the rat optic nerve. Application of adenosine protected the rat optic nerve from anoxic injury; 2.5 microM adenosine increased compound action potential (CAP) recovery after a standard 60-min anoxic period from 28.6 +/- 2.5%, mean +/- SE, to 51.0 +/- 3.1% (P < 0001). The protective effect of adenosine was abolished by the adenosine receptor antagonist theophylline (100 microM). 2. The protective effect of adenosine evolved slowly after adenosine application; maximum protection required 60 min of adenosine exposure before the onset of anoxia. The concentration dependence of the protective effect was parabolic, with maximum protection at 2.5 microM. Neither high nor very low adenosine concentrations protected against anoxia. These characteristics are similar to those previously found for the inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the same preparation. 3. Inhibition of adenosine receptors (100 microM theophylline) reduced the level of recovery from that found under control conditions (24.3 +/- 4.8% compared with 36.2 +/- 2.5%, P < 0.05). The adenosine uptake inhibitor propentofylline, which potentiates release of endogenous adenosine during brain anoxia, significantly increased CAP recovery after anoxia. This effect was abolished by theophylline. It appeared therefore that release of endogenous adenosine limited injury in the optic nerve during anoxia. 4. The protective effect of adenosine was removed by pretreatment with the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor staurosporine (10 nM), indicating that activation of PKC was required for protection after exposure to adenosine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Koga, D. C. Reutens, P. Wright, T. Phan, R. Markus, B. Pedreira, G. Fitt, I. Lim, and G. A. Donnan
The Existence and Evolution of Diffusion-Perfusion Mismatched Tissue in White and Gray Matter After Acute Stroke
Stroke, October 1, 2005; 36(10): 2132 - 2137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
B. B. Sun and S. Y. Chiu
N-Type Calcium Channels and Their Regulation by GABAB Receptors in Axons of Neonatal Rat Optic Nerve
J. Neurosci., July 1, 1999; 19(13): 5185 - 5194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online