JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 73: 431-435, 1995;
0022-3077/95 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nichols, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sparks, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nichols, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sparks, D. L.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 73, Issue 1 431-435, Copyright © 1995 by APS


ARTICLES

Nonstationary properties of the saccadic system: new constraints on models of saccadic control

M. J. Nichols and D. L. Sparks
Institute of Neurological Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104.

1. We tested the predictions of two models of the saccadic burst generator by electrically stimulating sites in primate superior colliculus (SC) immediately following visually guided movements. 2. The amplitude and direction of stimulated saccades depend systematically on the amplitude and direction of preceding visually guided saccades, and that effect decays exponentially with a time constant of approximately 45 ms. The saccadic system, then, displays an amplitude-dependent non-stationarity that follows an exponential time course during the intersaccadic interval (ISI). 3. These results are consistent with a variant of the eye displacement model proposed by Jurgens et al. but not with Robinson's classic model of the burst generator. Moreover, since all models of saccadic control must predict either stationary or nonstationary behavior during the ISI, these results provide a powerful new constraint on those models. 4. Finally, the success of the displacement model in accounting for our data suggests a new explanation for the results of colliding saccade experiments.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Vliegen, T. J. Van Grootel, and A. J. Van Opstal
Gaze Orienting in Dynamic Visual Double Steps
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 4300 - 4313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. A. Smith and J. D. Crawford
Distributed Population Mechanism for the 3-D Oculomotor Reference Frame Transformation
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1742 - 1761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Izawa, H. Suzuki, and Y. Shinoda
Suppression of Visually and Memory-Guided Saccades Induced by Electrical Stimulation of the Monkey Frontal Eye Field. II. Suppression of Bilateral Saccades
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2004; 92(4): 2261 - 2273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. R. Metzger, O. A. Mullette-Gillman, A. M. Underhill, Y. E. Cohen, and J. M. Groh
Auditory Saccades From Different Eye Positions in the Monkey: Implications for Coordinate Transformations
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2004; 92(4): 2622 - 2627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Brecht, W. Singer, and A. K. Engel
Amplitude and Direction of Saccadic Eye Movements Depend on the Synchronicity of Collicular Population Activity
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 424 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. D. Van Beuzekom and J.A.M. Van Gisbergen
Collicular Microstimulation During Passive Rotation Does Not Generate Fixed Gaze Shifts
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2002; 87(6): 2946 - 2963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. A. Edelman and M. E. Goldberg
Effect of Short-Term Saccadic Adaptation on Saccades Evoked by Electrical Stimulation in the Primate Superior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2002; 87(4): 1915 - 1923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. W. Gnadt, M. E. Jackson, and O. Litvak
Analysis of the Frequency Response of the Saccadic Circuit: System Behavior
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2001; 86(2): 724 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. J. Gandhi and E. L. Keller
Activity of the Brain Stem Omnipause Neurons During Saccades Perturbed by Stimulation of the Primate Superior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1999; 82(6): 3254 - 3267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. D. Corneil, C. A. Hing, D. V. Bautista, and D. P. Munoz
Human Eye-Head Gaze Shifts in a Distractor Task. I. Truncated Gaze Shifts
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1999; 82(3): 1390 - 1405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. Fujii, H. Mushiake, and J. Tanji
Intracortical Microstimulation of Bilateral Frontal Eye Field
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 1998; 79(4): 2240 - 2244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H.H.L.M. Goossens and A. J. V. Opstal
Local Feedback Signals Are Not Distorted By Prior Eye Movements: Evidence From Visually Evoked Double Saccades
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1997; 78(1): 533 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
R. P. Kalesnykas and D. L. Sparks
{blacksquare} REVIEW : The Primate Superior Colliculus and the Control of Saccadic Eye Movements
Neuroscientist, September 1, 1996; 2(5): 284 - 292.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online