JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 73: 496-505, 1995;
0022-3077/95 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raboisson, P.
Right arrow Articles by Woda, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raboisson, P.
Right arrow Articles by Woda, A.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 73, Issue 2 496-505, Copyright © 1995 by APS


ARTICLES

Effects of subcutaneous formalin on the activity of trigeminal brain stem nociceptive neurones in the rat

P. Raboisson, R. Dallel, P. Clavelou, B. J. Sessle and A. Woda
Laboratoire de Physiologie Oro-Faciale, Faculte de Chirurgie Dentaire, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

1. The subcutaneous injection of Formalin (5%, 50 microliters) into the receptive field of convergent (wide dynamic range) nociceptive neurons in the spinal dorsal horn has previously been reported to produce a prolonged biphasic response with a time course similar to the observed in behavioral experiments. However, conflicting data in other studies led us to examine the effects of Formalin on the activity of convergent nociceptive neurons at two levels of the trigeminal (V) brain stem complex, namely V subnuclei oralis (Sp5O) and caudalis (Sp5C). 2. Single neuron activity was extracellularly recorded in anesthetized rats. Each neuron was classified as convergent on the basis of its responses to both mechanical and transcutaneous electrical stimuli applied to its mechanoreceptive field (RF). All neurons responded to innocuous and noxious mechanical stimuli and had electrically evoked responses corresponding to both A and C fiber afferent inputs. Seventeen Sp5O and 32 Sp5C convergent neurons received an injection (50 microliters sc) of 5% Formalin into the center of their RF. 3. Three groups of neurons were distinguished: one group that was not activated by the Formalin injection (Sp5O, n = 1; Sp5C, n = 2), another group that responded only with an early and short-lasting response [monophasic neurons: Sp5O, n = 11 (65%); Sp5C, n = 10 (31%)], and a third group that responded with two phases separated by a short period of quiescence [biphasic neurons: Sp5O, n = 5 (29%); Sp5C, n = 20 (62.5%)]. The proportion of biphasic neurons was significantly higher in Sp5C than in Sp5O. 4. The first phases of the Sp5O neurons were not significantly different in terms of duration and frequency from those of the Sp5C neurons. However, duration and discharge frequency of the first phase of biphasic neurons were significantly greater than for monophasic neurons in Sp5C (nonsignificant in Sp5O). The second tonic period of excitation of all biphasic neurons was gradual in outset and offset, and long in duration (23-39 min). The duration of the second phase was significantly longer for the biphasic neurons in Sp5C than for those in Sp5O. 5. Our findings suggest that the mono- and biphasic neurons may have different roles in the transmission of nociceptive information induced by the peripheral injection of Formalin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. E. Belforte and J. H. Pazo
Striatal Inhibition of Nociceptive Responses Evoked in Trigeminal Sensory Neurons by Tooth Pulp Stimulation
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1730 - 1741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
A. Woda
Pain in the Trigeminal System: from Orofacial Nociception to Neural Network Modeling
J. Dent. Res., October 1, 2003; 82(10): 764 - 768.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. Hu, C. Y. Chiang, J. W. Hu, J. O. Dostrovsky, and B. J. Sessle
P2X Receptors in Trigeminal Subnucleus Caudalis Modulate Central Sensitization in Trigeminal Subnucleus Oralis
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 1614 - 1624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
V. Galhardo, A. V. Apkarian, and D. Lima
Peripheral Inflammation Increases the Functional Coherency of Spinal Responses to Tactile but not Nociceptive Stimulation
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 2096 - 2103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. F. M. DaSilva, L. Becerra, N. Makris, A. M. Strassman, R. G. Gonzalez, N. Geatrakis, and D. Borsook
Somatotopic Activation in the Human Trigeminal Pain Pathway
J. Neurosci., September 15, 2002; 22(18): 8183 - 8192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. Y. Chiang, B. Hu, J. W. Hu, J. O. Dostrovsky, and B. J. Sessle
Central Sensitization of Nociceptive Neurons in Trigeminal Subnucleus Oralis Depends on Integrity of Subnucleus Caudalis
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2002; 88(1): 256 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
K. Mizuta, S. Kuchiiwa, T. Saito, H. Mayanagi, K. Karita, and H. Izumi
Involvement of trigeminal spinal nucleus in parasympathetic reflex vasodilatation in cat lower lip
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2002; 282(2): R492 - R500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. J. Park, C. Y. Chiang, J. W. Hu, and B. J. Sessle
Neuroplasticity Induced by Tooth Pulp Stimulation in Trigeminal Subnucleus Oralis Involves NMDA Receptor Mechanisms
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2001; 85(5): 1836 - 1846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J.-M. Dessirier, C. T. Simons, M. Sudo, S. Sudo, and E. Carstens
Sensitization, Desensitization and Stimulus-Induced Recovery of Trigeminal Neuronal Responses to Oral Capsaicin and Nicotine
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2000; 84(4): 1851 - 1862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. T. Simons, J. -M. Dessirier, M. I. Carstens, M. O'Mahony, and E. Carstens
Neurobiological and Psychophysical Mechanisms Underlying the Oral Sensation Produced by Carbonated Water
J. Neurosci., September 15, 1999; 19(18): 8134 - 8144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. Iwata, A. Tashiro, Y. Tsuboi, T. Imai, R. Sumino, T. Morimoto, R. Dubner, and K. Ren
Medullary Dorsal Horn Neuronal Activity in Rats with Persistent Temporomandibular Joint and Perioral Inflammation
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1999; 82(3): 1244 - 1253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. B. Katz, S. A. Simon, A. Moody, and M. A. L. Nicolelis
Simultaneous Reorganization in Thalamocortical Ensembles Evolves Over Several Hours After Perioral Capsaicin Injections
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 963 - 977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. Carstens, N. Kuenzler, and H. O. Handwerker
Activation of Neurons in Rat Trigeminal Subnucleus Caudalis by Different Irritant Chemicals Applied to Oral or Ocular Mucosa
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1998; 80(2): 465 - 492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. Dallel, C. Duale, and J.-L. Molat
Morphine Administered in the Substantia Gelatinosa of the Spinal Trigeminal Nucleus Caudalis Inhibits Nociceptive Activities in the Spinal Trigeminal Nucleus Oralis
J. Neurosci., May 15, 1998; 18(10): 3529 - 3536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online