Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 73, Issue 3 1084-1100, Copyright © 1995 by APS

ARTICLES

Delay-tuned neurons in the midbrain of the big brown bat

S. P. Dear and N. Suga
Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA.

1. The auditory midbrain in Eptesicus contains delay-tuned neurons that encode target range. Most delay-tuned neurons respond poorly to tones or individual frequency-modulated (FM) sweeps and require combinations of FM sweeps. They are combination sensitive and delay tuned. The index of facilitation (IF), a coefficient measuring combination sensitivity for individual delay-tuned neurons, ranged from 0.14 to 1.0, with an average of 0.64 +/- 0.24 (mean +/- SD). Of the 33 facilitated responses from 29 neurons, 23 (70%) exhibited IFs > 0.5, which corresponds to a facilitated response 3 times greater than the sum of the responses to individual pulse and echoes. Thus the responses of midbrain delay-tuned neurons are highly combination sensitive. 2. The response of midbrain delay-tuned neurons is phasic, with an average of 0.7 +/- 0.4 action potentials elicited per optimal pulse-echo pair. Thus midbrain delay-tuned neurons in Eptesicus act as probability encoders. 3. The distribution of best echo delays (BDs) of midbrain delay-tuned neurons ranged from 8 to 30 ms. As an ensemble, midbrain delay-tuned neurons encode target ranges of 138-516 cm. There is a basic correspondence between the physiologically determined span of midbrain BDs between 8 and 30 ms and the behaviorally determined borders of the approach (8- to 17-ms echo delay) and search stages (17- to 30-ms echo delay) of the insect pursuit sequence. Midbrain delay-tuned neurons can be separated into two subpopulations on the basis of the difference in distributions of the echo best amplitude (EBA) tuning at BD. The BDs of one subpopulation correspond to the span of search stage echo delays, and the BDs of the other subpopulation correspond to the span of approach stage echo delays. 4. EBAs of neurons in each subpopulation are tailored to the specific perceptual requirements of the corresponding behavioral stage. EBAs of midbrain neurons tuned to echo delays between 17 and 30 ms (N = 12) correspond to the search stage and are suited to the requirements of target detection. EBAs of midbrain neurons tuned to echo delays between 17 and 30 ms (N = 21) correspond to the approach stage and are suited to the requirements of target size discrimination. 5. The best FM sweeps for the pulse (PFM) and echo (EFM) were determined for each midbrain neuron. PFMs appear to cluster at frequencies corresponding to the three harmonic peaks in the emitted pulse power spectra.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. M. N. Woolley, P. R. Gill, and F. E. Theunissen Stimulus-Dependent Auditory Tuning Results in Synchronous Population Coding of Vocalizations in the Songbird Midbrain J. Neurosci., March 1, 2006; 26(9): 2499 - 2512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. N. Woolley and J. H. Casseday Processing of Modulated Sounds in the Zebra Finch Auditory Midbrain: Responses to Noise, Frequency Sweeps, and Sinusoidal Amplitude Modulations J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2005; 94(2): 1143 - 1157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. N. Woolley and J. H. Casseday Response Properties of Single Neurons in the Zebra Finch Auditory Midbrain: Response Patterns, Frequency Coding, Intensity Coding, and Spike Latencies J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 136 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. I. Sanderson and J. A. Simmons Selectivity for Echo Spectral Interference and Delay in the Auditory Cortex of the Big Brown Bat Eptesicus fuscus J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2002; 87(6): 2823 - 2834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. I. Sanderson and J. A. Simmons Neural Responses to Overlapping FM Sounds in the Inferior Colliculus of Echolocating Bats J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2000; 83(4): 1840 - 1855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. V. Portfors and J. J. Wenstrup Delay-Tuned Neurons in the Inferior Colliculus of the Mustached Bat: Implications for Analyses of Target Distance J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1999; 82(3): 1326 - 1338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. E. Valentine and C. F. Moss Spatially Selective Auditory Responses in the Superior Colliculus of the Echolocating Bat J. Neurosci., March 1, 1997; 17(5): 1720 - 1733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]