JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 73: 1341-1354, 1995;
0022-3077/95 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sary, G.
Right arrow Articles by Orban, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sary, G.
Right arrow Articles by Orban, G. A.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 73, Issue 4 1341-1354, Copyright © 1995 by APS


ARTICLES

Responses of monkey inferior temporal neurons to luminance-, motion-, and texture-defined gratings

G. Sary, R. Vogels, G. Kovacs and G. A. Orban
Laboratorium voor Neuro- en Psychofysiologie, Katholieke Universiteit te Leuven, Belgium.

1. We recorded from neurons responsive to gratings in the inferior temporal (IT) cortices of macaque monkeys. One of the monkeys performed an orientation discrimination task; the other maintained fixation during stimulus presentation. Stimuli consisted of gratings based on discontinuities in luminance, relative motion, and texture. 2. IT cells responded well to gratings defined solely by relative motion, implying either direct or indirect motion input into IT, an area that is part of the ventral visual cortical pathway. 3. Response strength in general did not depend on the cue used to define the gratings. Latency values observed for the two static grating types (luminance- and texture-defined gratings) were similar, but significantly shorter than those measured for the kinetic gratings. 4. Stimulus orientation had a significant effect in 27%, 27%, and 9% of the cells tested with luminance-, kinetic-, and texture-defined gratings, respectively. 5. Only a small proportion of cells were orientation sensitive for more than one defining cue. The average preferred orientation for luminance and kinetic gratings matched; the tuning width was similar for the two cues. 6. Our results indicate that IT cells may contribute to cue-invariant coding of boundaries and edges. We discuss the relevance of these results to visual perception.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
G. A. Orban
Higher Order Visual Processing in Macaque Extrastriate Cortex
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 59 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Larsson, M. S. Landy, and D. J. Heeger
Orientation-Selective Adaptation to First- and Second-Order Patterns in Human Visual Cortex
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 862 - 881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. Kida, S. Shimegi, and H. Sato
Similarity of Direction Tuning Among Responses to Stimulation of Different Whiskers in Neurons of Rat Barrel Cortex
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 2004 - 2018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. W. Self and S. Zeki
The Integration of Colour and Motion by the Human Visual Brain
Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2005; 15(8): 1270 - 1279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. Tamura, H. Kaneko, K. Kawasaki, and I. Fujita
Presumed Inhibitory Neurons in the Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex: Visual Response Properties and Functional Interactions With Adjacent Neurons
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2004; 91(6): 2782 - 2796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Ozeki, O. Sadakane, T. Akasaki, T. Naito, S. Shimegi, and H. Sato
Relationship between Excitation and Inhibition Underlying Size Tuning and Contextual Response Modulation in the Cat Primary Visual Cortex
J. Neurosci., February 11, 2004; 24(6): 1428 - 1438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
V. L. Marcar, S. E. Raiguel, D. Xiao, and G. A. Orban
Processing of Kinetically Defined Boundaries in Areas V1 and V2 of the Macaque Monkey
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2000; 84(6): 2786 - 2798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Uka, H. Tanaka, K. Yoshiyama, M. Kato, and I. Fujita
Disparity Selectivity of Neurons in Monkey Inferior Temporal Cortex
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2000; 84(1): 120 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. L. Shulman, J. Schwarz, F. M. Miezin, and S. E. Petersen
Effect of Motion Contrast on Human Cortical Responses to Moving Stimuli
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1998; 79(5): 2794 - 2803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. W. Greenlee and A. T. Smith
Detection and Discrimination of First- and Second-Order Motion in Patients with Unilateral Brain Damage
J. Neurosci., January 15, 1997; 17(2): 804 - 818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online