Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 73, Issue 4 1547-1567, Copyright © 1995 by APS

ARTICLES

Interaction between center and surround in rabbit retinal ganglion cells

D. K. Merwine, F. R. Amthor and N. M. Grzywacz
Department of Physiological Optics, School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham 35294, USA.

1. The interaction between the center and surround mechanisms of a variety of rabbit retinal ganglion cell classes was examined in extracellular single-unit recordings in an isolated eyecup preparation. Ganglion cell classes studied included on and off brisk sustained and transient, on and off sluggish sustained and transient, on-off and on directionally selective, orientationally selective, and large field units. The surround effects observed were qualitatively similar in all these ganglion cell classes. 2. The average response-versus-contrast functions for stimuli within the ganglion cells' receptive-field centers were relatively linear between threshold and saturation for all ganglion cell classes examined. The major effect of surround stimulation on the center response-versus-contrast function was a reduction in the slope of the linear portion of the curve, rather than a downward, parallel shift of the function. Stimulation of the surround had no systematically significant effect on the contrast threshold for the center spot, and, when it did have a significant effect, it sometimes decreased, rather than increased the magnitude of threshold. 3. Step changes in surround contrast were most effective when they were made simultaneously with step changes in the center; surround inhibition decreased significantly when it preceded stimulation of the center by > 100 ms and was generally ineffective when preceding the center by > 500 ms. The decrease in the inhibitory effect of surround stimulation was a monotonic function of delay between 0 and 500 ms. 4. Stimulation of the surround by step changes in the contrast of a sine-wave grating annulus produced qualitatively similar results to those obtained for pure luminance modulations. This suggests that the surround mechanism observed in these experiments was not due to pure luminance adaptation within the surround. The inhibitory effect of sine-wave gratings in the surround decreased monotonically as a function of spatial frequency. 5. Stimulation with a spot and an annulus that were both entirely within the ganglion cell's excitatory receptive-field center typically yielded nonadditive summation at contrasts whose linear sum of responses were below saturation. The effect of an annulus within the receptive-field center on responses elicited by a central spot quantitatively resembled the inhibition elicited from annuli in the inhibitory surround, after the excitatory center response due to the annulus was taken into account. These results suggest that the inhibiton elicited from the surrounds of the ganglion cells in these experiments extended into their receptive-field centers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Xu, N. K. Dhingra, R. G. Smith, and P. Sterling Sluggish and Brisk Ganglion Cells Detect Contrast With Similar Sensitivity J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2005; 93(5): 2388 - 2395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Flores-Herr, D. A. Protti, and H. Wassle Synaptic Currents Generating the Inhibitory Surround of Ganglion Cells in the Mammalian Retina J. Neurosci., July 1, 2001; 21(13): 4852 - 4863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Balboa and N. M. Grzywacz The Minimal Local-Asperity Hypothesis of Early Retinal Lateral Inhibition Neural Comput., July 1, 2000; 12(7): 1485 - 1517. [Abstract] [Full Text]