JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 73: 1829-1842, 1995;
0022-3077/95 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kondoh, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Newland, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kondoh, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Newland, P. L.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 73, Issue 5 1829-1842, Copyright © 1995 by APS


ARTICLES

Dynamics of neurons controlling movements of a locust hind leg: Wiener kernel analysis of the responses of proprioceptive afferents

Y. Kondoh, J. Okuma and P. L. Newland
Honda R&D, Wako Research Center, Saitama, Japan.

1. The response properties of proprioceptive sensory neurons providing input to the local circuits controlling leg movements of the locust have been analysed by the Wiener kernel method. The proprioceptor, the femoral chordotonal organ, encodes the position and movements of the tibia about the femorotibial joint. 2. Intracellular recordings were made from sensory neurons while the apodeme of the organ was moved with a band-limited Gaussian white noise signal with a cutoff frequency of 27, 58, or 117 Hz. To define the input-output characteristics of the neurons, the first- and second-order Wiener kernels were computed by a cross-correlation between the spike response of the afferents and the white noise stimulus. 3. White noise stimulation elicited sustained spiking in 50 out of 54 afferents throughout the 20 s periods of stimulation and recording. The first-order kernels, the linear response properties, of these afferents were of six basic types that were dependent on the cutoff frequency of the white noise stimulus. These included 1) flexion-sensitive afferents that were primarily position sensitive irrespective of stimulus frequency, 2) flexion-sensitive afferents that were position sensitive at low frequencies but also coded velocity at higher frequencies, 3) flexion-sensitive afferents that coded velocity at all stimulus frequencies, 4) flexion-sensitive afferents that coded velocity at low stimulus frequencies but also acceleration at high frequencies, 5) extension-sensitive afferents that coded velocity at all stimulus frequencies, and 6) extension-sensitive afferents that coded velocity at low stimulus frequencies and acceleration at high frequencies. A seventh type contained the four remaining afferents that adapted rapidly to the stimulus within 3-5 s. These were all extension-acceleration sensitive irrespective of stimulus frequency. 4. The gain curves (produced by Fourier transform of the 1st-order kernels) and the power spectra of the linear models (produced by convolving the 1st-order kernels with the white noise) demonstrated that responses in the position-sensitive afferents are representative of a constant gain low-pass filter with a cutoff frequency of approximately 80 Hz, whereas those in the velocity- and acceleration-sensitive afferents are band passed, having peaks at 80 Hz. 5. The main nonlinearity was a signal compression in which the diagonal peak(s) of the second-order nonlinear kernels offset one or more peaks of the first-order kernels and represents a rectification or directional sensitivity of the afferents.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. DiCaprio, C. P. Billimoria, and B. Ch. Ludwar
Information Rate and Spike-Timing Precision of Proprioceptive Afferents
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1706 - 1717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. R. Gamble and R. A. DiCaprio
Nonspiking and Spiking Proprioceptors in the Crab: White Noise Analysis of Spiking CB-Chordotonal Organ Afferents
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 1815 - 1825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. DiCaprio
Nonspiking and Spiking Proprioceptors in the Crab: Nonlinear Analysis of Nonspiking TCMRO Afferents
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 1826 - 1836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. L. Newland and Y. Kondoh
Dynamics of Neurons Controlling Movements of a Locust Hind Leg III. Extensor Tibiae Motor Neurons
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1997; 77(6): 3297 - 3310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. L. Newland and Y. Kondoh
Dynamics of Neurons Controlling Movements of a Locust Hind Leg II. Flexor Tibiae Motor Neurons
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 1997; 77(4): 1731 - 1746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online