JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 74: 162-178, 1995;
0022-3077/95 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kubota, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kubota, K.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 74, Issue 1 162-178, Copyright © 1995 by APS


ARTICLES

Mnemonic firing of neurons in the monkey temporal pole during a visual recognition memory task

K. Nakamura and K. Kubota
Department of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Kyoto University, Aichi, Japan.

1. We examined single-neuronal activity in the temporal pole of monkeys, including the anterior ventromedial temporal (VMT) cortex (the temporopolar cortex, area 36, area 35, and the entorhinal cortex) and the anterior inferotemporal (IT) cortex, during a visual recognition memory task. In the task, a trial began when the monkey pressed a lever. After a waiting period, a visual sample stimulus (S) was presented one to four times on a monitor with an interstimulus delay. Thereafter, a new stimulus (R) was presented. The monkeys were trained to remember S during the delay period and to release the lever in response to R. Colored photographs of natural objects were used as visual stimuli. 2. About 70% of the recorded neurons (225 of 311) responded to at least one of the Ss tested. Thirty percent of these neurons (68 of 225) continued to fire during the subsequent delay periods. In 75% of these neurons (51 of 68), the firing during the delay period strongly correlated with the response to S. 3. The discharge rate during the delay period did not correlate with the monkey's eye movements, pressing or releasing of the lever, or the reaction time. 4. If the monkey erroneously released the lever in response to S or during the delay period, the firing disappeared after the erroneous lever release. If the monkey failed to release the lever in response to R, the firing persisted even after R was withdrawn. The discharge rate in incorrect trials was comparable with that in correct trials. The neurons were considered to fire for as long as the memory of S was necessary. 5. Firing persisted even when an achromatic version or half (even a portion) of S was presented, indicating that the color, a particular portion, or the entire shape of S was not always necessary to elicit firing. 6. An S that elicited firing during the delay period invariably elicited a visual response. Neurons that fired during the delay period showed a higher stimulus selectivity than other visually responsive neurons in the anterior VMT cortex. Thus neurons that fire during the delay period represent a subgroup of visually responsive neurons that are selectively tuned to a certain stimulus. 7. More neurons fired during the delay period in the anterior VMT cortex than in the anterior IT cortex. 8. We conclude that firing during the delay period by neurons in the temporal pole reflects the short-term storage of visual information regarding a particular S.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
V. Yakovlev, D. J. Amit, S. Romani, and S. Hochstein
Universal Memory Mechanism for Familiarity Recognition and Identification
J. Neurosci., January 2, 2008; 28(1): 239 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
H. BARBAS
Specialized Elements of Orbitofrontal Cortex in Primates
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2007; 1121(1): 10 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
K. K. Sreenivasan, J. Katz, and A. P. Jha
Temporal Characteristics of Top-Down Modulations during Working Memory Maintenance: An Event-related Potential Study of the N170 Component.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2007; 19(11): 1836 - 1844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
O. J. Hulme and S Zeki
The Sightless View: Neural Correlates of Occluded Objects
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2007; 17(5): 1197 - 1205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. R. Lehky and K. Tanaka
Enhancement of Object Representations in Primate Perirhinal Cortex During a Visual Working-Memory Task
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1298 - 1310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
C. Ranganath, M. X. Cohen, and C. J. Brozinsky
Working Memory Maintenance Contributes to Long-term Memory Formation: Neural and Behavioral Evidence
J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2005; 17(7): 994 - 1010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
P. E. Latham and S. Nirenberg
Computing and Stability in Cortical Networks
Neural Comput., July 1, 2004; 16(7): 1385 - 1412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. Ranganath, M. X. Cohen, C. Dam, and M. D'Esposito
Inferior Temporal, Prefrontal, and Hippocampal Contributions to Visual Working Memory Maintenance and Associative Memory Retrieval
J. Neurosci., April 21, 2004; 24(16): 3917 - 3925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. J. Zatorre, M. Bouffard, and P. Belin
Sensitivity to Auditory Object Features in Human Temporal Neocortex
J. Neurosci., April 7, 2004; 24(14): 3637 - 3642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. E. Hampson, T. P. Pons, T. R. Stanford, and S. A. Deadwyler
Categorization in the monkey hippocampus: A possible mechanism for encoding information into memory
PNAS, March 2, 2004; 101(9): 3184 - 3189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
N. Brunel
Dynamics and Plasticity of Stimulus-selective Persistent Activity in Cortical Network Models
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2003; 13(11): 1151 - 1161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
T. J. Druzgal and M. D'Esposito
Dissecting Contributions of Prefrontal Cortex and Fusiform Face Area to Face Working Memory
J. Cogn. Neurosci., August 1, 2003; 15(6): 771 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
Y. Tanaka, Y. Miyazawa, R. Hashimoto, I. Nakano, and T. Obayashi
Postencephalitic focal retrograde amnesia after bilateral anterior temporal lobe damage
Neurology, July 1, 1999; 53(2): 344 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Hasegawa, T. Sawaguchi, and K. Kubota
Monkey Prefrontal Neuronal Activity Coding the Forthcoming Saccade in an Oculomotor Delayed Matching-to-Sample Task
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 1998; 79(1): 322 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. A. Suzuki, E. K. Miller, and R. Desimone
Object and Place Memory in the Macaque Entorhinal Cortex
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1997; 78(2): 1062 - 1081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Desimone
Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention
PNAS, November 26, 1996; 93(24): 13494 - 13499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
E. K. Miller, C. A. Erickson, and R. Desimone
Neural Mechanisms of Visual Working Memory in Prefrontal Cortex of the Macaque
J. Neurosci., August 15, 1996; 16(16): 5154 - 5167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online