JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 74: 1271-1286, 1995;
0022-3077/95 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casanova, C.
Right arrow Articles by Minville, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Casanova, C.
Right arrow Articles by Minville, K.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 74, Issue 3 1271-1286, Copyright © 1995 by APS


ARTICLES

Comparison of the responses to moving texture patterns of simple and complex cells in the cat's area 17

C. Casanova, T. Savard, J. P. Nordmann, S. Molotchnikoff and K. Minville
Department of Surgery-Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.

1. Whether complex (C) cells are the only truly texture-sensitive units in the cat's primary visual cortex remains controversial. In view of the strong physiological significance of having putatively only one class of cells sensitive to visual noise in the striate cortex, we reinvestigated this issue. Sensitivities of simple (S) and C cells to noise were quantitatively studied and compared in order to clearly document the response properties of cells in the striate cortex to visual noise and to establish whether one can unequivocally segregate S from C cells on the basis of those specific properties. 2. Receptive fields were stimulated with all relevant stimuli, i.e., drifting sine-wave gratings, electronically generated noise pattern of 256 x 256 elements (ratio 1:1 of dark and light elements), and flashing and moving bars (both bright and dark). 3. A total of 60 S cells out of 85 (70.6%) and 90 C cells out of 101 (81.8%) responded to the motion of visual noise. Responses of most C cells were sustained, i.e., their discharge rate was maintained at a constant level throughout presentation of the stimulus. On the other hand, responses of the majority of S cells were characterized by several bursts of discharges. On average, optimal firing rates were greater for gratings than for noise. 4. For practically all cells, responses to noise varied as a function of direction of motion. The mean direction bandwidths were, respectively, 43 +/- 24 degrees and 48 +/- 23 degrees (mean +/- SD) for S and C cells. In both groups, neurons were more broadly tuned for the direction of noise than that of gratings (t-test, P < 0.001). We rarely observed bimodal tuning curves for noise, with each peak lying on either side of the orientation curve. These results could be expected if one considers texture stimuli not in the space domain (as dot patterns) but in the frequency domain, i.e., patterns containing all spatial frequencies and orientations. 5. In general, the direction indexes of S and C cells were similar whether they were stimulated by drifting noise or gratings. S cells had a slight tendency to be more direction selective for noise than for gratings. 6. For all S and C cells tested, responses to noise varied as a function of drift velocity. The mean optimal velocity was 12.9 and 10.2 degrees/s for S and C cells, respectively (t-test, P > 0.05). Most cells were band-pass with mean bandwidths of 2.2 and 2.7 octaves for S and C cells, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. A. Hietanen, N. A. Crowder, N. S. C. Price, and M. R. Ibbotson
Influence of adapting speed on speed and contrast coding in the primary visual cortex of the cat
J. Physiol., October 15, 2007; 584(2): 451 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N.S.C. Price, N. A. Crowder, M. A. Hietanen, and M. R. Ibbotson
Neurons in V1, V2, and PMLS of Cat Cortex Are Speed Tuned But Not Acceleration Tuned: The Influence of Motion Adaptation
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 660 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. A. Bourne, R. Tweedale, and M. G.P. Rosa
Physiological Responses of New World Monkey V1 Neurons to Stimuli Defined by Coherent Motion
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2002; 12(11): 1132 - 1145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Anzai, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman
Neural Mechanisms for Processing Binocular Information I. Simple Cells
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 891 - 908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
P. Kara and M. J. Friedlander
Arginine Analogs Modify Signal Detection by Neurons in the Visual Cortex
J. Neurosci., July 1, 1999; 19(13): 5528 - 5548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online