Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 74, Issue 4 1382-1394, Copyright © 1995 by APS

ARTICLES

Mechanisms underlying direction selectivity of neurons in the primary visual cortex of the macaque

H. Sato, N. Katsuyama, H. Tamura, Y. Hata and T. Tsumoto
Department of Neurophysiology, Osaka University Medical School, Japan.

1. We studied the effects of blocking intracortical inhibition by microiontophoretic administration of bicuculline methiodide (BMI), a selective antagonist for gamma-aminobutyric acid-A receptors, on direction sensitivity of 103 neurons in the primary visual cortex (VI) of anesthetized and paralyzed monkeys. 2. The direction selectivity index (DSI) of each cell was calculated for the control response and response during the BMI administration at the optimal stimulus orientation to assess the directionality of an individual cell. 3. The averaged direction tuning of visual responses of cells was sharp in layers IVa and IVb, moderate in both interblob and blob regions of layer II/III and layers V and VI, and poor in layers IVc alpha and IVc beta. 4. Iontophoretic administration of BMI uncovered or facilitated responses to stimuli moving in the nonpreferred direction, and reduced DSIs of cells to a varying extent in all the layers except layer VI. Responses to stimuli moving in the preferred direction were also facilitated so that a slight bias of response toward the originally preferred direction remained during BMI administration in most cells. 5. Most of the cells in layers II/III (both blobs and interblobs) and IVb that receive inputs from layers IVc alpha and IVc beta showed a clear reduction of direction selectivity during BMI administration. This result suggests that intracortical inhibition plays an important role in the elaboration of direction selectivity at the second stage of information processing in VI. 6. The direction selectivity of cells in layer VI was most resistant to the effects of BMI, suggesting that it is dependent on excitatory inputs that are already direction selective, even though the sample size of this layer was small. 7. In direction-selective cells outside layer VI, responses to a stimulus moving in the preferred direction were enhanced in a way that was linearly related with those in the nonpreferred direction as the BMI dose was increased. This suggests that various amounts of inhibition interact linearly with directionally biased excitatory inputs to raise the firing threshold to various levels so as to produce various degrees of directionality. 8. These results suggest that, in most of the directionally sensitive cells except for those in layer VI, there are excitatory inputs which are bidirectional but slightly biased to one direction, and that the intracortical inhibition raises a threshold level of responses to excitatory inputs so that the response become direction selective.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. G. Nowak, M. V. Sanchez-Vives, and D. A. McCormick Lack of Orientation and Direction Selectivity in a Subgroup of Fast-Spiking Inhibitory Interneurons: Cellular and Synaptic Mechanisms and Comparison with Other Electrophysiological Cell Types Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2008; 18(5): 1058 - 1078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Gur and D. M. Snodderly Physiological differences between neurons in layer 2 and layer 3 of primary visual cortex (V1) of alert macaque monkeys J. Physiol., May 1, 2008; 586(9): 2293 - 2306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Gur and D. M. Snodderly Direction selectivity in V1 of alert monkeys: evidence for parallel pathways for motion processing J. Physiol., December 1, 2007; 585(2): 383 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Roerig, B. Chen, and J. P.-Y. Kao Different Inhibitory Synaptic Input Patterns in Excitatory and Inhibitory Layer 4 Neurons of Ferret Visual Cortex Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2003; 13(4): 350 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Wang, I. Fujita, H. Tamura, and Y. Murayama Contribution of GABAergic Inhibition to Receptive Field Structures of Monkey Inferior Temporal Neurons Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2002; 12(1): 62 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Rivadulla, J. Sharma, and M. Sur Specific Roles of NMDA and AMPA Receptors in Direction-Selective and Spatial Phase-Selective Responses in Visual Cortex J. Neurosci., March 1, 2001; 21(5): 1710 - 1719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Shimegi, T. Akasaki, T. Ichikawa, and H. Sato Physiological and Anatomical Organization of Multiwhisker Response Interactions in the Barrel Cortex of Rats J. Neurosci., August 15, 2000; 20(16): 6241 - 6248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Murthy and A. L. Humphrey Inhibitory Contributions to Spatiotemporal Receptive-Field Structure and Direction Selectivity in Simple Cells of Cat Area 17 J Neurophysiol, March 1, 1999; 81(3): 1212 - 1224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. L. Humphrey and A. B. Saul Strobe Rearing Reduces Direction Selectivity in Area 17 by Altering Spatiotemporal Receptive-Field Structure J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1998; 80(6): 2991 - 3004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Kautz and H. Wagner GABAergic Inhibition Influences Auditory Motion-Direction Sensitivity in Barn Owls J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1998; 80(1): 172 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Single, J. Haag, and A. Borst Dendritic Computation of Direction Selectivity and Gain Control in Visual Interneurons J. Neurosci., August 15, 1997; 17(16): 6023 - 6030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]