Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 74, Issue 4 1787-1792, Copyright © 1995 by APS

ARTICLES

Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm

P. Dizio and J. R. Lackner
Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02254-9110, USA.

1. Reaching movements made in a rotating room generate Coriolis forces that are directly proportional to the cross product of the room's angular velocity and the arm's linear velocity. Such Coriolis forces are inertial forces not involving mechanical contact with the arm. 2. We measured the trajectories of arm movements made in darkness to a visual target that was extinguished at the onset of each reach. Prerotation subjects pointed with both the right and left arms in alternating sets of eight movements. During rotation at 10 rpm, the subjects reached only with the right arm. Postrotation, the subjects pointed with the left and right arms, starting with the left, in alternating sets of eight movements. 3. The initial perrotary reaching movements of the right arm were highly deviated both in movement path and endpoint relative to the prerotation reaches of the right arm. With additional movements, subjects rapidly regained straight movement paths and accurate endpoints despite the absence of visual or tactile feedback about reaching accuracy. The initial postrotation reaches of the left arm followed straight paths to the wrong endpoint. The initial postrotation reaches of the right arm had paths with mirror image curvature to the initial perrotation reaches of the right arm but went to the correct endpoint. 4. These observations are inconsistent with current equilibrium point models of movement control. Such theories predict accurate reaches under our experimental conditions. Our observations further show independent implementation of movement and posture, as evidenced by transfer of endpoint adaptation to the nonexposed arm without transfer of path adaptation. Endpoint control may occur at a relatively central stage that represents general constraints such as gravitoinertial force background or egocentric direction relative to both arms, and control of path may occur at a more peripheral stage that represents moments of inertia and muscle dynamics unique to each limb. 5. Endpoint and path adaptation occur despite the absence both of mechanical contact cues about the perturbing force and visual or tactile cues about movement accuracy. These findings point to the importance of muscle spindle signals, monitoring of motor commands, and possibly joint and tendon receptors in a detailed trajectory monitoring process. Muscle spindle primary and secondary afferent signals may differentially influence adaptation of movement shape and endpoint, respectively.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Tremblay, G. Houle, and D. J. Ostry Specificity of Speech Motor Learning J. Neurosci., March 5, 2008; 28(10): 2426 - 2434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Ghez, R. Scheidt, and H. Heijink Different Learned Coordinate Frames for Planning Trajectories and Final Positions in Reaching J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3614 - 3626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Scheidt and C. Ghez Separate Adaptive Mechanisms for Controlling Trajectory and Final Position in Reaching J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3600 - 3613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. G. Mattar and D. J. Ostry Modifiability of Generalization in Dynamics Learning J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3321 - 3329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Scheidt and T. Stoeckmann Reach Adaptation and Final Position Control Amid Environmental Uncertainty After Stroke J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2824 - 2836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Scheidt, M. A. Conditt, E. L. Secco, and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi Interaction of Visual and Proprioceptive Feedback During Adaptation of Human Reaching Movements J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3200 - 3213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Malfait, P. L. Gribble, and D. J. Ostry Generalization of Motor Learning Based on Multiple Field Exposures and Local Adaptation J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3327 - 3338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Wang and R. L. Sainburg Adaptation to Visuomotor Rotations Remaps Movement Vectors, Not Final Positions J. Neurosci., April 20, 2005; 25(16): 4024 - 4030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Wang and R. L. Sainburg Interlimb Transfer of Novel Inertial Dynamics Is Asymmetrical J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 349 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Dingwell, C. D. Mah, and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi Experimentally Confirmed Mathematical Model for Human Control of a Non-Rigid Object J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2004; 91(3): 1158 - 1170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. E. Brown, D. A. Rosenbaum, and R. L. Sainburg Limb Position Drift: Implications for Control of Posture and Movement J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 3105 - 3118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Hirashima, K. Kudo, and T. Ohtsuki Utilization and Compensation of Interaction Torques During Ball-Throwing Movements J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 1784 - 1796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. Criscimagna-Hemminger, O. Donchin, M. S. Gazzaniga, and R. Shadmehr Learned Dynamics of Reaching Movements Generalize From Dominant to Nondominant Arm J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2003; 89(1): 168 - 176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Dingwell, C. D. Mah, and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi Manipulating Objects With Internal Degrees of Freedom: Evidence for Model-Based Control J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2002; 88(1): 222 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Scheidt, J. B. Dingwell, and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi Learning to Move Amid Uncertainty J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2001; 86(2): 971 - 985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Bosco and R. E. Poppele Proprioception From a Spinocerebellar Perspective Physiol Rev, April 1, 2001; 81(2): 539 - 568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. DiZio and J. R. Lackner Coriolis-Force-Induced Trajectory and Endpoint Deviations in the Reaching Movements of Labyrinthine-Defective Subjects J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2001; 85(2): 784 - 789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Scheidt, D. J. Reinkensmeyer, M. A. Conditt, W. Z. Rymer, and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi Persistence of Motor Adaptation During Constrained, Multi-Joint, Arm Movements J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2000; 84(2): 853 - 862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. V. Cohn, P. DiZio, and J. R. Lackner Reaching During Virtual Rotation: Context Specific Compensations for Expected Coriolis Forces J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2000; 83(6): 3230 - 3240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Lackner and P. Dizio Gravitoinertial Force Background Level Affects Adaptation to Coriolis Force Perturbations of Reaching Movements J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1998; 80(2): 546 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]