JN Miami Valley Hospital
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 74: 2538-2547, 1995;
0022-3077/95 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Juusola, M.
Right arrow Articles by French, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Juusola, M.
Right arrow Articles by French, A. S.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 74, Issue 6 2538-2547, Copyright © 1995 by APS

ARTICLES

Nonlinear models of the first synapse in the light-adapted fly retina

M. Juusola, M. Weckstrom, R. O. Uusitalo, M. J. Korenberg and A. S. French
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

1. Randomly modulated light stimuli were used to characterize the nonlinear dynamic properties of the synapse between photoreceptors and large monopolar neurons (LMC) in the fly retina. Membrane potential fluctuations produced by constant variance contrast stimuli were recorded at eight different levels of background light intensity. 2. Representation of the photoreceptor-LMC input-output data in the form of traditional characteristic curves indicated that synaptic gain was reduced by light adaptation. However, this representation did not include the time-dependent properties of the synaptic function, which are known to be nonlinear. Therefore nonlinear systems analysis was used to characterize the synapse. 3. The responses of photoreceptors and LMCs to random light fluctuations were characterized by second-order Volterra series, with kernel estimation by the parallel cascade method. Photoreceptor responses were approximately linear, but LMC responses were clearly nonlinear. 4. Synaptic input-output relationships were measured by passing the light stimuli to LMCs through the measured photoreceptor characteristics to obtain an estimate of the synaptic input. The resulting nonlinear synaptic functions were well characterized by second-order Volterra series. They could not be modeled by a linear-nonlinear-linear cascade but were better approximated by a nonlinear-linear-nonlinear cascade. 5. These results support two possible structural models of the synapse, the first having two parallel paths for signal flow between the photoreceptor and LMC, and the second having two distinct nonlinear operations, occurring before and after chemical transmission. 6. The two models were cach used to calculate the synaptic gain to a brief change in photoreceptor membrane potential. Both models predicted that synaptic gain is reduced by light adaptation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
J. P. Lindemann, R. Kern, J. H. van Hateren, H. Ritter, and M. Egelhaaf
On the Computations Analyzing Natural Optic Flow: Quantitative Model Analysis of the Blowfly Motion Vision Pathway
J. Neurosci., July 6, 2005; 25(27): 6435 - 6448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. O. Uusitalo and M. Weckstrom
Potentiation in the First Visual Synapse of the Fly Compound Eye
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2000; 83(4): 2103 - 2112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Juusola and A. S. French
Visual Acuity for Moving Objects in First- and Second-Order Neurons of the Fly Compound Eye
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 1997; 77(3): 1487 - 1495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online