JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 75: 439-453, 1996;
0022-3077/96 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (52)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Groh, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sparks, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Groh, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sparks, D. L.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 75, Issue 1 439-453, Copyright © 1996 by APS


ARTICLES

Saccades to somatosensory targets. III. eye-position-dependent somatosensory activity in primate superior colliculus

J. M. Groh and D. L. Sparks
Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, USA.

1. We recorded from cells with sensory responses to somatosensory stimuli in the superior colliculus (SC) of awake monkeys. Our goal was to determine the frame of reference of collicular somatosensory signals by seeing whether the positions of the eyes influenced the responses of cells to a given tactile stimulus. Somatosensory targets consisted of vibrotactile stimuli delivered to the hands, which were held in fixed spatial positions. Monkeys performed a delayed saccade task from different initial fixation positions to the locations of these tactile stimuli or to visual stimuli at approximately the same location. 2. The responses of a majority of somatosensory cells (25 of 34 or 74%) were significantly affected by eye position. Nearly all somatosensory cells also responded to visual targets (28 of 30, 93%). Cells whose somatosensory responses depended on eye position responded to visual and somatosensory targets located at approximately the same direction in space with respect to the eyes. 3. The activity of these cells exhibited both sensory and motor qualities. The discharge was more closely linked in time to stimulus onset than to the movement. Sensory features of the stimulus were reflected in the responses: the discharge of a number of cells was phase-locked to the pulses of vibration. The sensory responses occurred even if the animal's next saccade was not directed into the response field of the cell. However, two thirds of the cells also exhibited a burst of motor activity in conjunction with the saccade to the somatosensory target. Sensory and motor activity were not always spatially coextensive. When different, the tuning of motor activity was broader. 4. Cells with somatosensory responses to vibratory stimulation of the hands were found in a wide region of the SC, spanning a 40 degrees range of movement amplitudes. 5. These data show that somatosensory signals in the SC are not purely somatotopic but are dependent on eye position. For stimuli at a fixed location, this eye position dependence allows somatosensory and visual signals to be in register and share a premotor circuitry for guiding saccadic eye movements. 6. The dependence of the somatosensory responses on eye position suggests that the somatosensory receptive fields may either shift on the body surface or they may be restricted to a limited region of the body surface but be gated by eye (and body) position. Future experiments varying body position and the location of the stimulus on the body surface are needed to determine which of these alternatives is correct. Cells with either type of receptive field could provide an unambiguous signal of the location of somatosensory saccade targets with respect to the eyes. The transformation of somatosensory signals from a body-centered frame of reference to a frame of reference that depends on the position of the stimulus with respect to the eyes is necessary for the correct activation of collicular neurons with motor activity, because this activity encodes saccades as desired changes in eye position.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. Tanaka
Spatiotemporal Properties of Eye Position Signals in the Primate Central Thalamus
Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2007; 17(7): 1504 - 1515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. D. Horwitz and W. T. Newsome
Target Selection for Saccadic Eye Movements: Direction-Selective Visual Responses in the Superior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2001; 86(5): 2527 - 2542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
G. Bosco and R. E. Poppele
Proprioception From a Spinocerebellar Perspective
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2001; 81(2): 539 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S.F.W. Neggers and H. Bekkering
Ocular Gaze is Anchored to the Target of an Ongoing Pointing Movement
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2000; 83(2): 639 - 651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. S. A. Graziano, X. T. Hu, and C. G. Gross
Visuospatial Properties of Ventral Premotor Cortex
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1997; 77(5): 2268 - 2292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online