Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 75, Issue 3 1177-1189, Copyright © 1996 by APS

ARTICLES

Mechanical response properties of nociceptors innervating feline hairy skin

P. C. Garell, S. L. McGillis and J. D. Greenspan
Department of Neurosurgery, State University of New York Health Science Center, Syracuse 13210, USA.

1. The responses of feline cutaneous nociceptors were examined in vivo by systematically manipulating the intensive and spatial dimensions of mechanical stimulation. A computer-controlled motor was used to apply prescribed forces (5-90 g) to a nociceptor's receptive field, with flat-tipped, cylindrical probes of various sizes (contact areas: 0.1-5.0 mm2). The stimulating device and protocols were similar to those previously used to evaluate human perception, thus allowing for comparisons of the two data sets. 2. With a ramp-and-hold stimulus of controlled force, most nociceptors showed a slowly adapting (SA) response throughout the stimulus. In this way, nociceptors resembled low-threshold SA mechanoreceptors. However, in contrast to SA mechanoreceptors, nociceptors failed to exhibit an onset burst of activity associated with the stimulus ramp. Nineteen percent (6 of 31) of the nociceptors often showed the opposite trend during the stimulus, e.g., a gradually increasing firing rate. Most of these nociceptors (5 of 6) had particularly high mechanical thresholds. 3. With 30 stimuli repeated at short intervals (6-8 s), response rates tended to decrease across trials. This phenomenon was most evident with more intense stimuli. When two series of stimuli were separated by 4-5 min, there was no apparent trend of reduced responsiveness between series. 4. Overall, nociceptors responded in an orderly way to variations in force and probe size. For a given probe size, larger forces produced greater responses; for a given force, smaller probes produced greater responses. The relationship between probe size and force was best described as an even tradeoff between force and a linear dimension of the probe (i.e., probe perimeter), rather than the area of the probe. Thus a given pressure (force/area) did not evoke the same response from nociceptors as probe size was varied. 5. There were two significant differences in the mechanical responsiveness between A fiber and C fiber nociceptors. First, for a given set of stimuli, A fiber nociceptors exhibited a greater response rate than the C fiber nociceptors. Second, the A fiber nociceptors exhibited a greater differential response related to probe size than the C fiber nociceptors. On the basis of these two features, the A fiber nociceptors' response profiles showed a closer parallel with previously reported human pain thresholds than the C fiber nociceptors did. 6. When the nociceptors were subdivided as to their mechanical threshold, those with lower thresholds [mechanically sensitive afferents (MSAs)] showed a response saturation with the more intense stimuli. On average, the stimulus levels at which saturation occurred were close to human pain threshold. Those nociceptors with higher thresholds [mechanically insensitive afferents (MIAs)] did not show such saturation. Thus only the MIAs appeared to have the capacity to unambiguously encode mechanical stimulus intensities above pain threshold. The MSAs, on the other hand, exhibited their greatest dynamic response range near the threshold for nonpainful sharpness. Thus the group of afferents commonly defined as nociceptors exhibit a heterogeneity of mechanical response properties, which may serve functionally different roles for perception.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Chen, Y. Lu, S. Kallakuri, A. Patwardhan, and J. M. Cavanaugh Distribution of A-{delta} and C-Fiber Receptors in the Cervical Facet Joint Capsule and Their Response to Stretch J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2006; 88(8): 1807 - 1816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. S. Ruehle, H. O. Handwerker, J. K. M. Lennerz, R. Ringler, and C. Forster Brain activation during input from mechanoinsensitive versus polymodal C-nociceptors. J. Neurosci., May 17, 2006; 26(20): 5492 - 5499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Slugg, J. N. Campbell, and R. A. Meyer The Population Response of A- and C-Fiber Nociceptors in Monkey Encodes High-Intensity Mechanical Stimuli J. Neurosci., May 12, 2004; 24(19): 4649 - 4656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Levy and A. M. Strassman Mechanical Response Properties of A and C Primary Afferent Neurons Innervating the Rat Intracranial Dura J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2002; 88(6): 3021 - 3031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Andrew and A. D. Craig Responses of Spinothalamic Lamina I Neurons to Maintained Noxious Mechanical Stimulation in the Cat J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2002; 87(4): 1889 - 1901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. Craig, K. Krout, and D. Andrew Quantitative Response Characteristics of Thermoreceptive and Nociceptive Lamina I Spinothalamic Neurons in the Cat J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2001; 86(3): 1459 - 1480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Malick, R. M. Strassman, and R. Burstein Trigeminohypothalamic and Reticulohypothalamic Tract Neurons in the Upper Cervical Spinal Cord and Caudal Medulla of the Rat J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2000; 84(4): 2078 - 2112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. S. Khalsa, C. Zhang, and Y.-X. Qin Encoding of Location and Intensity of Noxious Indentation Into Rat Skin by Spatial Populations of Cutaneous Mechano-Nociceptors J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2000; 83(5): 3049 - 3061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Slugg, R. A. Meyer, and J. N. Campbell Response of Cutaneous A- and C-Fiber Nociceptors in the Monkey to Controlled-Force Stimuli J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2000; 83(4): 2179 - 2191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Ziegler, W. Magerl, R. A. Meyer, and R.-D. Treede Secondary hyperalgesia to punctate mechanical stimuli: Central sensitization to A-fibre nociceptor input Brain, December 1, 1999; 122(12): 2245 - 2257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Weidner, M. Schmelz, R. Schmidt, B. Hansson, H. O. Handwerker, and H. E. Torebjork Functional Attributes Discriminating Mechano-Insensitive and Mechano-Responsive C Nociceptors in Human Skin J. Neurosci., November 15, 1999; 19(22): 10184 - 10190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Andrew and J. D. Greenspan Peripheral Coding of Tonic Mechanical Cutaneous Pain: Comparison of Nociceptor Activity in Rat and Human Psychophysics J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1999; 82(5): 2641 - 2648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R.-D. Treede, R. A. Meyer, and J. N. Campbell Myelinated Mechanically Insensitive Afferents From Monkey Hairy Skin: Heat-Response Properties J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1998; 80(3): 1082 - 1093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Reeve, A. H. Dickenson, and N. C. Kerr Spinal Effects of Bicuculline: Modulation of an Allodynia-Like State by an A1-Receptor Agonist, Morphine, and an NMDA-Receptor Antagonist J Neurophysiol, March 1, 1998; 79(3): 1494 - 1507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Koltzenburg, C. L. Stucky, and G. R. Lewin Receptive Properties of Mouse Sensory Neurons Innervating Hairy Skin J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1997; 78(4): 1841 - 1850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. S. Khalsa, R. H. Lamotte, and P. Grigg Tensile and Compressive Responses of Nociceptors in Rat Hairy Skin J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1997; 78(1): 492 - 505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Illich and E. T. Walters Mechanosensory Neurons Innervating Aplysia Siphon Encode Noxious Stimuli and Display Nociceptive Sensitization J. Neurosci., January 1, 1997; 17(1): 459 - 469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]