|
|
||||||||
Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 75, Issue 3 1256-1263, Copyright © 1996 by APS
ARTICLES |
T. A. Cummings, C. Daniels and S. C. Kinnamon
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523, USA.
1. The gigaseal voltage-clamp technique was used to record responses of hamster taste receptor cells to synthetic sweeteners and cyclic nucleotides. Voltage-dependent currents and steady-state currents were monitored during bath exchanges of saccharin, two high-potency sweeteners, 8-chlorophenylthio-adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (8cpt-cAMP), and dibutyryl-guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (db-cGMP). 2. Of the 237 fungiform taste cells studied, only one in eight was sweet responsive. Outward currents, both voltage-dependent and resting, were reduced by all of the sweeteners tested in sweet-responsive taste cells, whereas these currents were unaffected by sweeteners in sweet-unresponsive taste cells. 3. In every sweet-responsive cell tested, 8cpt-cAMP and db-cGMP mimicked the response to the sweeteners, but neither nucleotide elicited responses in sweet-unresponsive cells. Thus there was a one-to-one correlation between sweet responsivity and cyclic nucleotide responsivity. 4. Sweet responses showed cross adaptation with cyclic nucleotide responses. This indicates that the same ion channel is modulated by sweeteners and cyclic nucleotides. 5. The sweetener- and cyclic nucleotide-blocked current had an apparent reversal potential of -50 mV, which was close to the potassium reversal potential in these experiments. In addition, there was no effect of sweeteners and cyclic nucleotides in the presence of the K+ channel blocker tetraethylammonium bromide (TEA). These data suggest that block of a resting, TEA-sensitive K+ current is the final common step leading to taste cell depolarization during sweet transduction. 6. These data, together with data from a previous study (Cummings et al. 1993), suggest that both synthetic sweeteners and sucrose utilize second-messenger pathways that block a resting K+ conductance to depolarize the taste cell membrane.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. K. Kamerud and J. F. Delwiche Individual Differences in Perceived Bitterness Predict Liking of Sweeteners Chem Senses, November 1, 2007; 32(9): 803 - 810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Zhang, Z. Zhao, R. Margolskee, and E. Liman The Transduction Channel TRPM5 Is Gated by Intracellular Calcium in Taste Cells J. Neurosci., May 23, 2007; 27(21): 5777 - 5786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Trubey, S. Culpepper, Y. Maruyama, S. C. Kinnamon, and N. Chaudhari Tastants evoke cAMP signal in taste buds that is independent of calcium signaling Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): C237 - C244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Liu, D. R. Hansen, I. Kim, and T. A. Gilbertson Expression and characterization of delayed rectifying K+ channels in anterior rat taste buds Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, October 1, 2005; 289(4): C868 - C880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bigiani, R. Cristiani, F. Fieni, V. Ghiaroni, P. Bagnoli, and P. Pietra Postnatal Development of Membrane Excitability in Taste Cells of the Mouse Vallate Papilla J. Neurosci., January 15, 2002; 22(2): 493 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. F. Margolskee Molecular Mechanisms of Bitter and Sweet Taste Transduction J. Biol. Chem., January 4, 2002; 277(1): 1 - 4. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Ruiz, L. M. Stone, M. McPheeters, T. Ogura, B. Bottger, R. S. Lasher, T. E. Finger, and S. C. Kinnamon Maintenance of Rat Taste Buds in Primary Culture Chem Senses, September 1, 2001; 26(7): 861 - 873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Gilbertson, J. D. Boughter Jr, H. Zhang, and D. V. Smith Distribution of Gustatory Sensitivities in Rat Taste Cells: Whole-Cell Responses to Apical Chemical Stimulation J. Neurosci., July 1, 2001; 21(13): 4931 - 4941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Varkevisser and S. C. Kinnamon Sweet Taste Transduction in Hamster: Role of Protein Kinases J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2000; 83(5): 2526 - 2532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. DeSimone Focus on "Rapid entry of bitter and sweet tastants into liposomes and taste cells: implications for signal transduction" Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, January 1, 2000; 278(1): C13 - C16. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Peri, H. Mamrud-Brains, S. Rodin, V. Krizhanovsky, Y. Shai, S. Nir, and M. Naim Rapid entry of bitter and sweet tastants into liposomes and taste cells: implications for signal transduction Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, January 1, 2000; 278(1): C17 - C25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ming, Y. Ninomiya, and R. F. Margolskee Blocking taste receptor activation of gustducin inhibits gustatory responses to bitter compounds PNAS, August 17, 1999; 96(17): 9903 - 9908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Danilova, G. Hellekant, J.-M. Tinti, and C. Nofre Gustatory Responses of the Hamster Mesocricetus auratus to Various Compounds Considered Sweet by Humans J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1998; 80(4): 2102 - 2112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ogura, A. Mackay-Sim, and S. C. Kinnamon Bitter Taste Transduction of Denatonium in the Mudpuppy Necturus maculosus J. Neurosci., May 15, 1997; 17(10): 3580 - 3587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |