Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 75, Issue 5 1779-1805, Copyright © 1996 by APS

ARTICLES

Encoding of binocular disparity by simple cells in the cat's visual cortex

I. Ohzawa, G. C. DeAngelis and R. D. Freeman
School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley 94720-2020, USA.

1. Spatiotemporal receptive fields (RFs) for left and right eyes were studied for simple cells in the cat's striate cortex to examine the idea that stereoscopic depth information is encoded via structural differences of RFs between the two eyes. Traditional models are based on neurons that possess matched RF profiles for the two eyes. We propose a model that requires a subset of simple cells with mismatched RF profiles for the two eyes in addition to those with similar RF structure. 2. A reverse correlation technique, which allows a rapid measurement of detailed RF profiles in the joint space-time domains, was used to map RFs for isolated single neurons recorded extracellularly in the anesthetized paralyzed cat. 3. Approximately 30% of our sample of cells shows substantial differences between spatial RF structure for the two eyes. Nearly all of these neurons prefer orientations between oblique and vertical, and are therefore presumed to be involved in processing horizontal disparities. On the other hand, cells that prefer orientations near horizontal have matched RF profiles for the two eyes. Considered together, these findings suggest that the visual system takes advantage of the orientation anisotropy of binocular disparities present in the retinal images. 4. For some cells, the spatial structure of the RF changes over the time course of the response (inseparable RF in the space-time domain). In these cases, the change is similar for the two eyes, and therefore the difference remains nearly constant at all times. Because the difference of the RF structure between the two eyes is the critical determinant of a cell's relative depth selectivity for the proposed model, space-time inseparability of RFs is not an obstacle for consistent representation of stereoscopic information. 5. RF parameters including amplitude, RF width, and optimal spatial frequency are generally well matched for the two eyes over the time course of the response. The preferred speed and direction of motion are also well matched for the two eyes. These results suggest that the encoding of motion in depth is not likely to be a function of simple cells in the striate cortex. 6. The results presented here are consistent with our model, in which stereoscopic depth information is encoded via differences in the spatial structure of RFs for the two eyes. This model provides a natural binocular extension of the current notion of monocular spatial form encoding by a population of simple cells. Note, however, that our findings do not exclude the possibility that positional shifts of RFs also play a role in determining the disparity selectivity of cortical neurons.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. S. Sasaki and I. Ohzawa Internal Spatial Organization of Receptive Fields of Complex Cells in the Early Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1194 - 1212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Sanada and I. Ohzawa Encoding of Three-Dimensional Surface Slant in Cat Visual Areas 17 and 18 J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 2768 - 2786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Tanaka and I. Ohzawa Neural basis for stereopsis from second-order contrast cues. J. Neurosci., April 19, 2006; 26(16): 4370 - 4382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Nishimoto, T. Ishida, and I. Ohzawa Receptive field properties of neurons in the early visual cortex revealed by local spectral reverse correlation. J. Neurosci., March 22, 2006; 26(12): 3269 - 3280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Nishimoto, M. Arai, and I. Ohzawa Accuracy of Subspace Mapping of Spatiotemporal Frequency Domain Visual Receptive Fields J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3524 - 3536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Perez, A. F. Castro, M. S. Justo, M. A. Bermudez, and F. Gonzalez Retinal Correspondence of Monocular Receptive Fields in Disparity-Sensitive Complex Cells from Area V1 in the Awake Monkey Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2005; 46(4): 1533 - 1539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C.A. Read and B. G. Cumming Understanding the Cortical Specialization for Horizontal Disparity Neural Comput., October 1, 2004; 16(10): 1983 - 2020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Chen and N. Qian A Coarse-to-Fine Disparity Energy Model with Both Phase-Shift and Position-Shift Receptive Field Mechanisms Neural Comput., August 1, 2004; 16(8): 1545 - 1577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Menz and R. D. Freeman Functional Connectivity of Disparity-Tuned Neurons in the Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 1794 - 1807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. A. Read and B. G. Cumming Ocular Dominance Predicts Neither Strength Nor Class of Disparity Selectivity With Random-Dot Stimuli in Primate V1 J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2004; 91(3): 1271 - 1281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. A. Read and B. G. Cumming Testing Quantitative Models of Binocular Disparity Selectivity in Primary Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 2795 - 2817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. C. DeAngelis and T. Uka Coding of Horizontal Disparity and Velocity by MT Neurons in the Alert Macaque J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2003; 89(2): 1094 - 1111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.J.D. Prince, A. D. Pointon, B. G. Cumming, and A. J. Parker Quantitative Analysis of the Responses of V1 Neurons to Horizontal Disparity in Dynamic Random-Dot Stereograms J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 191 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.J.D. Prince, B. G. Cumming, and A. J. Parker Range and Mechanism of Encoding of Horizontal Disparity in Macaque V1 J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 209 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Chen, Y. Wang, and N. Qian Modeling V1 Disparity Tuning to Time-Varying Stimuli J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2001; 86(1): 143 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. V. Popple and D. M. Levi Amblyopes see true alignment where normal observers see illusory tilt PNAS, October 10, 2000; 97(21): 11667 - 11672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Nieder and H. Wagner Horizontal-Disparity Tuning of Neurons in the Visual Forebrain of the Behaving Barn Owl J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2000; 83(5): 2967 - 2979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Truchard, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman Contrast Gain Control in the Visual Cortex: Monocular Versus Binocular Mechanisms J. Neurosci., April 15, 2000; 20(8): 3017 - 3032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Qian and S. Mikaelian Relationship Between Phase and Energy Methods for Disparity Computation Neural Comput., February 1, 2000; 12(2): 279 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				E. Erwin and K. D. Miller The Subregion Correspondence Model of Binocular Simple Cells J. Neurosci., August 15, 1999; 19(16): 7212 - 7229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Anzai, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman Neural Mechanisms for Encoding Binocular Disparity: Receptive Field Position Versus Phase J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 874 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Anzai, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman Neural Mechanisms for Processing Binocular Information II. Complex Cells J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 909 - 924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. C. DeAngelis, G. M. Ghose, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman Functional Micro-Organization of Primary Visual Cortex: Receptive Field Analysis of Nearby Neurons J. Neurosci., May 15, 1999; 19(10): 4046 - 4064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Hirsch, J.-M. Alonso, R. C. Reid, and L. M. Martinez Synaptic Integration in Striate Cortical Simple Cells J. Neurosci., November 15, 1998; 18(22): 9517 - 9528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Victor and K. P. Purpura Spatial Phase and the Temporal Structure of the Response to Gratings in V1 J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1998; 80(2): 554 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Anzai, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman Neural mechanisms underlying binocular fusion and stereopsis: Position vs. phase PNAS, May 13, 1997; 94(10): 5438 - 5443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. M. Chino, E. L. Smith III, S. Hatta, and H. Cheng Postnatal Development of Binocular Disparity Sensitivity in Neurons of the Primate Visual Cortex J. Neurosci., January 1, 1997; 17(1): 296 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]