JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 75: 2036-2049, 1996;
0022-3077/96 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scott, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, C.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 75, Issue 5 2036-2049, Copyright © 1996 by APS


ARTICLES

Relation of chemical structure to spatial distribution of sensory responses in rat olfactory epithelium

J. W. Scott, L. M. Davis, D. Shannon and C. Kaplan
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322-3030, USA.

1. Electroolfactogram (EOG) recordings were made in three configurations from the rat olfactory epithelium. Each configuration compared recordings in the dorsomedial recess of the epithelium with recordings in ventral or lateral parts of the epithelium. Most comparisons were made with simultaneous recordings. The exception was a series in which the dorsal recess and lateral space between the base of two turbinate bones were directly exposed for odor application and recording. The spatial distributions of maximal responses were largely independent of recording configuration. 2. Simultaneous recordings compared dorsomedial and lateral sites in the epithelium during stimulation with a series of 50 odorants. The odorants that evoked larger responses in the lateral sites were usually compounds that lacked oxygen containing functional groups (such as the carbonyl group). This was true for straight chain and cyclic alkanes, for terpine compounds, and for aromatic compounds. The major exception was cineole, a bicyclic compound. All compounds containing ketone groups evoked larger dorsomedial responses. The responses of aldehydes and esters depended upon whether they were attached to aliphatic or aromatic chains. 3. In the three types of preparation, the sites responding best to ketones were in the same expression zone of the epithelium according to published maps for the rat and mouse. The sites responding best to odors without functional groups were in the far lateral or ventral region and corresponded to one of the two most lateral and ventral expression zones. This fact suggests that the receptors in these regions have a preference for particular chemical properties. This level of analysis cannot determine whether all receptors in each zone have a stronger response to certain properties of these odorants or whether each zone contains different proportions of receptors with these properties.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. W. Scott, H. P. Acevedo, L. Sherrill, and M. Phan
Responses of the Rat Olfactory Epithelium to Retronasal Air Flow
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 1941 - 1950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
G. C. Yang, P. W. Scherer, K. Zhao, and M. M. Mozell
Numerical Modeling of Odorant Uptake in the Rat Nasal Cavity
Chem Senses, March 1, 2007; 32(3): 273 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. W. Scott
Sniffing and Spatiotemporal Coding in Olfaction
Chem Senses, February 1, 2006; 31(2): 119 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
F. Xu, N. Liu, I. Kida, D. L. Rothman, F. Hyder, and G. M. Shepherd
Odor maps of aldehydes and esters revealed by functional MRI in the glomerular layer of the mouse olfactory bulb
PNAS, September 16, 2003; 100(19): 11029 - 11034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
M.A. Chaput
EOG Responses in Anesthetized Freely Breathing Rats
Chem Senses, December 1, 2000; 25(6): 695 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
P.E. Scott-Johnson, D. Blakley, and J.W. Scott
Effects of Air Flow on Rat Electroolfactogram
Chem Senses, December 1, 2000; 25(6): 761 - 768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. W. Scott, T. Brierley, and F. H. Schmidt
Chemical Determinants of the Rat Electro-Olfactogram
J. Neurosci., June 15, 2000; 20(12): 4721 - 4731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J. W. Scott and T. Brierley
A Functional Map in Rat Olfactory Epithelium
Chem Senses, December 1, 1999; 24(6): 679 - 690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
J. E. COMETTO-MUNIZ, W. S CAIN, M. H. ABRAHAM, and R. KUMARSINGH
Sensory Properties of Selected Terpenes: Thresholds for Odor, Nasal Pungency, Nasal Localization, and Eye Irritation
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., November 30, 1998; 855(1): 648 - 651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
T. C. Bozza and J. S. Kauer
Odorant Response Properties of Convergent Olfactory Receptor Neurons
J. Neurosci., June 15, 1998; 18(12): 4560 - 4569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. W. Scott, D. E. Shannon, J. Charpentier, L. M. Davis, and C. Kaplan
Spatially Organized Response Zones in Rat Olfactory Epithelium
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 1997; 77(4): 1950 - 1962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Ma and G. M. Shepherd
Functional mosaic organization of mouse olfactory receptor neurons
PNAS, November 7, 2000; 97(23): 12869 - 12874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online