Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 76, Issue 1 321-331, Copyright © 1996 by APS

ARTICLES

Brain-behavior relationships: evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility

M. Iacoboni, R. P. Woods and J. C. Mazziotta
Department of Neurology, Psychology, Pharmacology, and Radiological Sciences, Reed Neurological Research Center, UCLA School of Medicine 90095, USA.

1. We measured relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) changes with positron emission tomography and H(2) 15O in six normal subjects repeatedly performing a spatial stimulus-response compatibility task. Subjects had two motor response conditions. They were instructed to respond with the left hand to a left visual field light stimulus and with the right hand to a right visual field light stimulus (compatible condition), and with the right hand to a left visual field light stimulus and with the left hand to a right visual field light stimulus (incompatible condition). Six rCBF measurements per condition were performed in each subject. 2. Reaction times were faster (P < 0.0005) in the compatible (287 ms) than the incompatible (339 ms) condition (spatial stimulus-response compatibility effect). A bilateral increase (P < 0.05) in rCBF in the superior parietal lobule of the two hemispheres was observed during the incompatible condition when compared with the compatible one. No rCBF decreases were observed. Reaction times correlated (P < 0.0001) with the rCBF in the two activated superior parietal lobule areas. 3. Reaction times decreased with practice according to a linear trend (P < 0.05). Practice-related linear rCBF increases (P < 0.05) were observed in the dorsolateral prefrontal, premotor, and primary motor cortex of the left hemisphere. No significant rCBF decreases were observed. 4. Practice did not affect the spatial stimulus-response compatibility effect. A parallel shortening of reaction times was observed in both compatible and incompatible conditions, in both left and right hand responses, and in both left and right visual fields. Accordingly, when rCBF was analyzed, the spatial stimulus-response compatibility by practice interaction did not show any significant activated area. 5. These findings suggest that the two activated areas in the left and right superior parietal lobules subserve the mapping of the visual stimulus spatial attributes onto the motor response spatial attributes and that the rCBF increases in the incompatible response condition represent the more complex computational remapping required when stimuli and response do not match spatially. 6. The dorsolateral prefrontal, premotor, and motor rCBF linear increases in the left hemisphere seem to reflect the effect of practice on cortical processes common to both compatible and incompatible response conditions. These cortical processes presumably strengthen the links between stimuli and responses under different stimulus-response compatibility conditions. The lateralization of the rCBF increases suggests a left hemisphere superiority in these processes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. M. C. Kelly and H. Garavan Human Functional Neuroimaging of Brain Changes Associated with Practice Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2005; 15(8): 1089 - 1102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Terao, T. Furubayashi, S. Okabe, N. Arai, H. Mochizuki, S. Kobayashi, M. Yumoto, M. Nishikawa, N. K. Iwata, and Y. Ugawa Interhemispheric Transmission of Visuomotor Information for Motor Implementation Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2005; 15(7): 1025 - 1036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Jiang and N. Kanwisher Common Neural Substrates for Response Selection across Modalities and Mapping Paradigms J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2003; 15(8): 1080 - 1094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. H. Schumacher, P. A. Elston, and M. D'Esposito Neural Evidence for Representation Specific Response Selection J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2003; 15(8): 1111 - 1121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. L. Shulman, M. P. McAvoy, M. C. Cowan, S. V. Astafiev, A. P. Tansy, G. d'Avossa, and M. Corbetta Quantitative Analysis of Attention and Detection Signals During Visual Search J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 3384 - 3397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Carr, M. Iacoboni, M.-C. Dubeau, J. C. Mazziotta, and G. L. Lenzi Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: A relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas PNAS, April 29, 2003; 100(9): 5497 - 5502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Koski, M. Iacoboni, M.-C. Dubeau, R. P. Woods, and J. C. Mazziotta Modulation of Cortical Activity During Different Imitative Behaviors J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2003; 89(1): 460 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. Casey, K. M. Thomas, M. C. Davidson, K. Kunz, and P. L. Franzen Dissociating Striatal and Hippocampal Function Developmentally with a Stimulus-Response Compatibility Task J. Neurosci., October 1, 2002; 22(19): 8647 - 8652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Koski, A. Wohlschlager, H. Bekkering, R. P. Woods, M.-C. Dubeau, J. C. Mazziotta, and M. Iacoboni Modulation of Motor and Premotor Activity during Imitation of Target-directed Actions Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2002; 12(8): 847 - 855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. F. S. Rushworth, T. Paus, and P. K. Sipila Attention Systems and the Organization of the Human Parietal Cortex J. Neurosci., July 15, 2001; 21(14): 5262 - 5271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Iacoboni, A. Ptito, N. Y. Weekes, and E. Zaidel Parallel visuomotor processing in the split brain: cortico-subcortical interactions Brain, April 1, 2000; 123(4): 759 - 769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Cabeza and L. Nyberg Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies J. Cogn. Neurosci., January 1, 2000; 12(1): 1 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				E. E. Smith and J. Jonides Storage and Executive Processes in the Frontal Lobes Science, March 12, 1999; 283(5408): 1657 - 1661. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				E. Wascher, M. Reinhard, B. Wauschkuhn, and R. Verleger Spatial S-R Compatibility with Centrally Presented Stimuli: An Event-Related Asymmetry Study on Dimensional Overlap J. Cogn. Neurosci., March 1, 1999; 11(2): 214 - 229. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. S. Turner, S. T. Grafton, J. R. Votaw, M. R. Delong, and J. M. Hoffman Motor Subcircuits Mediating the Control of Movement Velocity: A PET Study J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1998; 80(4): 2162 - 2176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. H. Le, J. V. Pardo, and X. Hu 4 T-fMRI Study of Nonspatial Shifting of Selective Attention: Cerebellar and Parietal Contributions J Neurophysiol, March 1, 1998; 79(3): 1535 - 1548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. T. Grafton, A. H. Fagg, and M. A. Arbib Dorsal Premotor Cortex and Conditional Movement Selection: A PET Functional Mapping Study J Neurophysiol, February 1, 1998; 79(2): 1092 - 1097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]