JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 76: 1850-1857, 1996;
0022-3077/96 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, O.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, O.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, D. H.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 76, Issue 3 1850-1857, Copyright © 1996 by APS


ARTICLES

Uniform growth and neuronal integration

O. Olsen, F. Nadim, A. A. Hill and D. H. Edwards
Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.

1. The cable equations were analyzed to determine the effects of two patterns of uniform growth on the passive and active integrative properties of neurons. 2. During uniform isoelectrotonic growth, the diameters of all neuronal processes increase as the square of their increase in length, while the specific electrical properties and branch terminal conditions of the neuron remain constant. An analytic inductive proof is given to show that, for any neuron, uniform isoelectrotonic growth increases the input conductance everywhere by the cube of the growth factor, but leaves the active and passive spread of membrane potential within the neuron unchanged. The spread of membrane voltage is unchanged because this pattern of growth enables both the axial and membrane currents everywhere in the cell to increase by the cube of the growth factor. Synaptic inputs would evoke the same responses in the isoelectrotonically larger cell as in the smaller cell if the total postsynaptic conductance of the synapse increased with the dendritic membrane area. 3. During uniform isometric growth, the diameter and lengths of all processes increase by the same factor, while the specific electrical properties and branch terminal conditions remain constant. This pattern of uniform growth increases the input conductance by the square of the growth factor, and also increases the attenuation, delay, and low-pass filtering of the cell's responses. Voltage attenuation increases with isometric growth because the axial current increases in proportion to growth, while the membrane current increases in proportion to the square of the growth factor. Isometric growth reduces the ability of distal synaptic inputs to affect the membrane potential at proximal integrating sites, even after the synaptic conductance has increased to compensate for the increased input conductance. 4. These two patterns of uniform growth help define the consequences of all types of uniform growth for neuronal integration and responsiveness.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Bucher, A. A. Prinz, and E. Marder
Animal-to-Animal Variability in Motor Pattern Production in Adults and during Growth
J. Neurosci., February 16, 2005; 25(7): 1611 - 1619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online