JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 76: 3382-3403, 1996;
0022-3077/96 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tremblay, F.
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tremblay, F.
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, C. E.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 76, Issue 5 3382-3403, Copyright © 1996 by APS


ARTICLES

Cortical mechanisms underlying tactile discrimination in the monkey. I. Role of primary somatosensory cortex in passive texture discrimination

F. Tremblay, S. A. Ageranioti-Belanger and C. E. Chapman
Departement de Physiologie and Ecole de Readaptation, Faculte de Medecine, Universite de Montreal, Quebec.

1. The discharge patterns of 359 single neurons in the hand representation of primary somatosensory cortex (SI) of two monkeys (Macaca mulatta) were recorded during the performance of a passive texture discrimination task with the contralateral hand (104 in area 3b, 149 in area 1, and 106 in area 2). Three nyloprint surfaces were mounted on a drum that was rotated under the digit tips. One surface was entirely smooth, whereas the other two were smooth over the first half and rough over the second half (smooth/ rough) (raised dots, 1 mm high and 1 mm diam, in a rectangular array; spatial period of 3 mm across the rows and columns for most recordings; 9 mm between columns for selected recordings). The monkeys were trained to distinguish between the smooth and smooth/rough surfaces. After the surface presentation, the monkey indicated the texture of the second half of the surface by pushing or pulling, respectively, on a lever with the other arm. For most recordings an average tangential speed of 49 mm/s was tested. For selected recordings motor speed was incremented (63, 75, or 89 mm/s). 2. Two hundred eighty-three neurons had a cutaneous receptive field (RF) on the hand (96 in area 3b, 120 in area 1, and 67 in area 2). Thirty-five neurons had a deep RF (4 in area 3b, 15 in area 1, and 16 in area 2). Seven neurons had mixed cutaneous and deep RFs (4 in area 1, 3 in area 2). Thirty-four neurons had no identifiable RF (4 in area 3b, 10 in area 1, and 20 in area 2). 3. The discharge of 185 of 359 neurons was significantly modulated during the presentation of one or both surfaces compared with the discharge at rest. Cells with a cutaneous RF that included part or all of the distal phalangeal pads of the digits used in the task (usually digits III and IV) were more likely to be modulated during surface presentation (132 of 179, 74%) than those with a cutaneous RF not in contact with the surfaces (24 of 104, 23%). The remaining neurons (mixed, deep, or no RF) were also infrequently modulated (29 of 76, 38%). 4. Of the 185 modulated units, 118 cells were classified as texture related because there was a significant difference in the discharge rate evoked by the smooth/rough and smooth surfaces. Cells with a cutaneous RF that included the digital pads in contact with the surfaces were frequently texture related (100 of 132, 76%). Texture sensitivity was less frequently observed in the remaining modulated neurons (18 of 53, 34%: cutaneous RF not in contact with the surfaces, deep RF, mixed cutaneous and deep RF, no identifiable RF). 5. Texture-related neurons were found in areas 3b, 1, and 2. Two patterns of texture-related responses were observed in the 100 cutaneous units with an RF in contact with the surfaces. Thirty-one units were classified as showing a phasic response at the time the digits encountered the leading edge of the rough half of the surface. Fifty-eight cells were classified as phasic-tonic (or sometimes tonic at the slowest motor speeds) because the response lasted for the duration of the presentation of the rough portion of the surface. The remaining 11 neurons could not be readily classified into one or the other category and, indeed, generally showed clear texture-related responses only at higher motor speeds (> 49 mm/s, 9 of 11). 6. Speed sensitivity was systematically evaluated in 41 of 100 texture-related units with a cutaneous RF in contact with the surfaces. The discharge of 66% of the units (27 of 41) varied significantly with the speed of surface presentation, with discharge increasing at higher speeds. Speed sensitivity was found in all three cytoarchitectonic areas (6 of 6 cells in area 3b, 11 of 22 in area 1, and 10 of 13 in area 2). 7. Contact force was also systematically monitored in these experiments (69 of 100 texture-related cells with a cutaneous RF in contact with the surfaces). Linear regression analyses indicated than 22% (15 of 69) of the texture-related units were sensitive to contact force (13


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Depeault, E.-M. Meftah, and C. E. Chapman
Tactile Speed Scaling: Contributions of Time and Space
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1422 - 1434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. E. Chapman and E.-M. Meftah
Independent Controls of Attentional Influences in Primary and Secondary Somatosensory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 4094 - 4107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. Padberg, E. Disbrow, and L. Krubitzer
The Organization and Connections of Anterior and Posterior Parietal Cortex in Titi Monkeys: Do New World Monkeys Have an Area 2?
Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2005; 15(12): 1938 - 1963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E.-M. Meftah, J. Shenasa, and C. E. Chapman
Effects of a Cross-Modal Manipulation of Attention on Somatosensory Cortical Neuronal Responses to Tactile Stimuli in the Monkey
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2002; 88(6): 3133 - 3149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. R. Williams and C. E. Chapman
Time Course and Magnitude of Movement-Related Gating of Tactile Detection in Humans. III. Effect of Motor Tasks
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 1968 - 1979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. A. Harris, I. M. Harris, and M. E. Diamond
The Topography of Tactile Learning in Humans
J. Neurosci., February 1, 2001; 21(3): 1056 - 1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. E. Wheat and A. W. Goodwin
Tactile Discrimination of Gaps by Slowly Adapting Afferents: Effects of Population Parameters and Anisotropy in the Fingerpad
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2000; 84(3): 1430 - 1444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. W. Goodwin and H. E. Wheat
Effects of Nonuniform Fiber Sensitivity, Innervation Geometry, and Noise on Information Relayed by a Population of Slowly Adapting Type I Primary Afferents from the Fingerpad
J. Neurosci., September 15, 1999; 19(18): 8057 - 8070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Salimi, T. Brochier, and A. M. Smith
Neuronal Activity in Somatosensory Cortex of Monkeys Using a Precision Grip. III. Responses to Altered Friction Perturbations
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 1999; 81(2): 845 - 857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Hernandez, E. Salinas, R. Garcia, and R. Romo
Discrimination in the Sense of Flutter: New Psychophysical Measurements in Monkeys
J. Neurosci., August 15, 1997; 17(16): 6391 - 6400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. Jiang, F. Tremblay, and C. E. Chapman
Neuronal Encoding of Texture Changes in the Primary and the Secondary Somatosensory Cortical Areas of Monkeys During Passive Texture Discrimination
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 1997; 77(3): 1656 - 1662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online