Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 76, Issue 6 3682-3692, Copyright © 1996 by APS

ARTICLES

Representation of frequency in the primary auditory field of the barn owl forebrain

Y. E. Cohen and E. I. Knudsen
Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, California 94305-5401, USA.

1. The primary auditory field (PAF) constitutes the first telencephalic stage of auditory information processing in the classical auditory pathway. In this study we investigated the frequency representation in the PAF of the barn owl, a species with a broad frequency range of hearing and a highly advanced auditory system. 2. Single- and multiunit sites were recorded extracellularly in ketamine-anesthetized owls. The frequency response properties of PAF sites were assessed with the use of digitally synthesized dichotic stimuli. PAF sites (n = 442) either were unresponsive to tonal stimulation (but responsive to noise stimuli), were tuned for frequency, or had multipeaked frequency response profiles. Tuned sites responded best to frequencies between 0.2 and 8.8 kHz, a range that encompasses nearly the entire hearing range of the barn owl. Most sites responding best to frequencies < 4 kHz had relatively broad frequency tuning, whereas sites responding best to higher frequencies had either broad or narrow frequency tuning. Sites with multipeaked frequency response profiles typically had two response peaks. The first peak was usually between 1 and 3 kHz and the second was usually between 5 and 8 kHz; there was no systematic relationship between the two peak frequencies. 3. In dorsoventral electrode penetrations that contained sites with tuned and/or multipeaked response profiles, a "common frequency" was identified that elicited a maximal response from all of the sites in the penetration. 4. The PAF contains a single tonotopic field. Units tuned to low frequencies are located caudomedially, whereas units tuned to high frequencies are located rostrolaterally. Compared with the frequency representation along the basilar papilla and in other auditory structures, the PAF overrepresents low frequencies (< 4 kHz) that are important for barn owl vocalizations. Conversely, high frequencies (> or = 4 kHz), which are necessary for precise sound localization, are underrepresented relative to these more peripheral auditory structures. 5. There was considerable interindividual variability both in the relative magnification of different frequency ranges and in the orientation of the tonotopic map in the brain. 6. These results suggest that the barn owl PAF, like the mammalian primary auditory cortex, is a general processor of auditory information that is involved in the analysis of both the meaning (such as species-specific vocalizations) and the location of auditory stimuli. In addition, the high degree of interindividual variability in the representation of frequency information suggests that the barn owl PAF, like the mammalian auditory cortex, is subject to modification by sensory experience.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Vonderschen and H. Wagner Tuning to Interaural Time Difference and Frequency Differs Between the Auditory Arcopallium and the External Nucleus of the Inferior Colliculus J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2009; 101(5): 2348 - 2361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Perez and J. L. Pena Comparison of Midbrain and Thalamic Space-Specific Neurons in Barn Owls J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 783 - 790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Marsh, K. Nataraj, D. Gans, C. V. Portfors, and J. J. Wenstrup Auditory Responses in the Cochlear Nucleus of Awake Mustached Bats: Precursors to Spectral Integration in the Auditory Midbrain J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 88 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. L. Miller and E. I. Knudsen Adaptive Plasticity in the Auditory Thalamus of Juvenile Barn Owls J. Neurosci., February 1, 2003; 23(3): 1059 - 1065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. E. Cohen and E. I. Knudsen Representation of Binaural Spatial Cues in Field L of the Barn Owl Forebrain J Neurophysiol, February 1, 1998; 79(2): 879 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. E. Cohen, G. L. Miller, and E. I. Knudsen Forebrain Pathway for Auditory Space Processing in the Barn Owl J Neurophysiol, February 1, 1998; 79(2): 891 - 902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]