Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 76, Issue 6 3693-3704, Copyright © 1996 by APS

ARTICLES

Overarm throws with the nondominant arm: kinematics of accuracy

J. Hore, S. Watts, D. Tweed and B. Miller
Physiology Department, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

1. Overarm throws made with the nondominant arm are usually less accurate than those made with the dominant arm. The objective was to determine the errors in the joint rotations associated with this inaccuracy, and thereby to gain insight into the neural mechanisms that contribute to skill in overarm throwing. 2. Overarm throws from both left and right arms were recorded on different occasions as six right-handed subjects sat with a fixed trunk and threw 150 tennis balls at about the same speed at a 6-cm square on a target grid 3 m away. Joint rotations at the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and finger, and arm translations, were computed from recordings of arm segment orientations made with the magnetic-field search-coil technique. 3. All subjects threw less accurately in this task with the left (nondominant) arm. For throws made with the left arm, the height of ball impact on the target grid was related to hand trajectory length and to hand orientation in space at ball release, but not to hand trajectory height. 4. Two hypotheses were proposed to explain the decreased ball accuracy in the high-low direction during throwing with the nondominant arm: that it was caused by increased variability in the velocity or timing of onset of rotations at proximal joints (which determine the path of the hand through space) or increased variability in the velocity or timing of onset of finger extension (which determine the moment of ball release). 5. A prediction of the first hypothesis was that proximal joint rotations should be more variable in throws with the left arm. This was the case for the majority of proximal joint rotations in the six subjects when variability was examined in joint space. However, some proximal joint rotations were more variable in the right arm. 6. The first hypothesis was directly tested by determining whether hand angular position in space (which represents the sum of all proximal joint rotations) was related to ball impact height on the target grid at a fixed translational position in the throw. No relation was found between these variables for throws with the left arm in four subjects, whereas a weak relation was found for two subjects. It was concluded that, considering all subjects, the first hypothesis could not explain the results. 7. In contrast, in agreement with the second hypothesis, a strong relation (P < 0.001) was found in all subjects between ball impact height on the target grid and time of ball release for throws with the left arm, and with time of onset of finger extension. 8. Across all six subjects the timing precision (windows) for 95% of the throws was (for ball release) right arm, 9.3 ms; left arm, 22.5 ms; (for onset of finger extension) right arm, 13.7 ms; left arm, 26.7 ms. 9. Timing of onset of finger extension was no less accurate than timing of onset of other joint rotations for both left and right arms. However, simulations of throws showed that, for the same error in timing, finger extension had twice as large an effect on ball direction as any other joint rotation. Timing errors at the fingers have a greater effect than errors at other joints because finger errors are scaled by the higher angular velocity of the hand in space rather than by the smaller angular velocities of the individual joints. 10. It is concluded that although rotations were in general more variable at both proximal and distal joints of the nondominant (left) arm, the major cause of its decreased throwing accuracy was increased variability at the distal joints, i.e., in the timing of onset of finger extension. This may be due to a lack of precision in the commands from the right hemisphere to the left fingers in right-handed throwers.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Hore, M. O'Brien, and S. Watts Control of Joint Rotations in Overarm Throws of Different Speeds Made by Dominant and Nondominant Arms J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 3975 - 3986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Hirashima, K. Ohgane, K. Kudo, K. Hase, and T. Ohtsuki Counteractive Relationship Between the Interaction Torque and Muscle Torque at the Wrist Is Predestined in Ball-Throwing J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 1449 - 1463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. HORE, D. TIMMANN, and S. WATTS Disorders in Timing and Force of Finger Opening in Overarm Throws Made by Cerebellar Subjects Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2002; 978(1): 1 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. B. IVRY, R. M. SPENCER, H. N. ZELAZNIK, and J. DIEDRICHSEN The Cerebellum and Event Timing Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2002; 978(1): 302 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Timmann, R. Citron, S. Watts, and J. Hore Increased Variability in Finger Position Occurs Throughout Overarm Throws Made by Cerebellar and Unskilled Subjects J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2001; 86(6): 2690 - 2702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Sainburg and D. Kalakanis Differences in Control of Limb Dynamics During Dominant and Nondominant Arm Reaching J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2000; 83(5): 2661 - 2675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Hore, S. Watts, and D. Tweed Prediction and Compensation by an Internal Model for Back Forces During Finger Opening in an Overarm Throw J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1999; 82(3): 1187 - 1197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Timmann, S. Watts, and J. Hore Failure of Cerebellar Patients to Time Finger Opening Precisely Causes Ball High-Low Inaccuracy in Overarm Throws J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1999; 82(1): 103 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. P. Verschueren, P. J. Cordo, and S. P. Swinnen Representation of Wrist Joint Kinematics by the Ensemble of Muscle Spindles From Synergistic Muscles J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1998; 79(5): 2265 - 2276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]