Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 76, Issue 6 3895-3909, Copyright © 1996 by APS

ARTICLES

Differential responses of Aplysia siphon motor neurons and interneurons to tail and mantle stimuli: implications for behavioral response specificity

X. Fang and G. A. Clark
Psychology Department, Princeton University, New Jersey 08544, USA.

1. Tail shock and mantle shock elicit different forms of siphon responses in Aplysia (flaring and backward bending vs. constriction and forward bending, respectively). Moreover, training with these two unconditioned stimuli (USs) in US-alone or classical conditioning paradigms differentially modifies the direction of the response to a siphon tap subsequently presented. As a first step toward addressing neural mechanisms underlying this response specificity, we systematically mapped the central siphon withdrawal circuit to determine which motor neurons and interneurons are differentially engaged by, and potentially modified by, tail and mantle USs. We utilized semi-intact preparations consisting of the intact mantle organs (including the gill and siphon), the tail, and the abdominal and circumesophageal ganglia. USs were delivered either cutaneously through silver wires implanted in the tail and mantle or via suction electrodes to the tail and branchial nerves. 2. We found that one class of central siphon motor neurons, the LFSB cells, was preferentially activated by tail USs, whereas other siphon motor neurons, the LBs cells and RDs cells, were preferentially activated by mantle USs. These motor neurons thus appear to be the final common path for the differential siphon movements to these USs. In addition, because activation of these cells can elicit neuromuscular facilitation and thereby enhance siphon movements, this differential activation may contribute to behavioral response specificity by imposing a specific response bias. 3. L29 interneurons, which both mediate and modulate the siphon withdrawal response, responded preferentially and exhibited synaptic facilitation selectively in response to tail shock USs. In contrast, L34 and the interneuron II network did not show differential activation. Facilitation at L29-LFSB connections following training with tail shock may contribute to tail-directed siphon responses to siphon tap and may thus be an additional mechanism contributing to behavioral response specificity. Possibly, facilitation at other L29 connections could also enhance its modulatory capabilities. 4. The generation of specific response topographies thus appears to involve the coordinate regulation of diverse neuronal elements and multiple mechanisms, which may contribute to different aspects of learning.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Marinesco, N. Wickremasinghe, and T. J. Carew Regulation of Behavioral and Synaptic Plasticity by Serotonin Release within Local Modulatory Fields in the CNS of Aplysia J. Neurosci., December 6, 2006; 26(49): 12682 - 12693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. S. Bristol, S. Marinesco, and T. J. Carew Neural Circuit of Tail-Elicited Siphon Withdrawal in Aplysia. II. Role of Gated Inhibition in Differential Lateralization of Sensitization and Dishabituation J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2004; 91(2): 678 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. S. Bristol, T. M. Fischer, and T. J. Carew Combined Effects of Intrinsic Facilitation and Modulatory Inhibition of Identified Interneurons in the Siphon Withdrawal Circuitry of Aplysia J. Neurosci., November 15, 2001; 21(22): 8990 - 9000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]