| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Institut für Zoologie der Technischen Universität München, 85747 Garching, Germany
Köppl, Christine. Frequency tuning and spontaneous activity in the auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus magnocellularis of the barn owl Tyto alba. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 364-377, 1997. Single-unit recordings were obtained from the brain stem of the barn owl at the level of entrance of the auditory nerve. Auditory nerve and nucleus magnocellularis units were distinguished by physiological criteria, with the use of the response latency to clicks, the spontaneous discharge rate, and the pattern of characteristic frequencies encountered along an electrode track. The response latency to click stimulation decreased in a logarithmic fashion with increasing characteristic frequency for both auditory nerve and nucleus magnocellularis units. The average difference between these populations was 0.4-0.55 ms. The most sensitive thresholds were ~0 dB SPL and varied little between 0.5 and 9 kHz. Frequency-threshold curves showed the simple V shape that is typical for birds, with no indication of a low-frequency tail. Frequency selectivity increased in a gradual, power-law fashion with increasing characteristic frequency. There was no reflection of the unusual and greatly expanded mapping of higher frequencies on the basilar papilla of the owl. This observation is contrary to the equal-distance hypothesis that relates frequency selectivity to the spatial respresentation in the cochlea. On the basis of spontaneous rates and/or sensitivity there was no evidence for distinct subpopulations of auditory nerve fibers, such as the well-known type I afferent response classes in mammals. On the whole, barn owl auditory nerve physiology conformed entirely to the typical patterns seen in other bird species. The only exception was a remarkably small spread of thresholds at any one frequency, this being only 10-15 dB in individual owls. Average spontaneous rate was 72.2 spikes/s in the auditory nerve and 219.4 spikes/s for nucleus magnocellularis. This large difference, together with the known properties of endbulb-of-Held synapses, suggests a convergence of ~2-4 auditory nerve fibers onto one nucleus magnocellularis neuron. Some auditory nerve fibers as well as nucleus magnocellularis units showed a quasiperiodic spontaneous discharge with preferred intervals in the time-interval histogram. This phenomenon was observed at frequencies as high as 4.7 kHz.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. J. Fischer, G. B. Christianson, and J. L. Pena Cross-Correlation in the Auditory Coincidence Detectors of Owls J. Neurosci., August 6, 2008; 28(32): 8107 - 8115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. H. Keller and T. T. Takahashi Localization and Identification of Concurrent Sounds in the Owl's Auditory Space Map J. Neurosci., November 9, 2005; 25(45): 10446 - 10461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Lu and E. W Rubel Activation of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors Inhibits High-Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel Currents of Chicken Nucleus Magnocellularis Neurons J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1418 - 1428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. B. Neiman and D. F. Russell Two Distinct Types of Noisy Oscillators in Electroreceptors of Paddlefish J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 492 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. N. Woolley and J. H. Casseday Response Properties of Single Neurons in the Zebra Finch Auditory Midbrain: Response Patterns, Frequency Coding, Intensity Coding, and Spike Latencies J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 136 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. L. Spezio and T. T. Takahashi Frequency-Specific Interaural Level Difference Tuning Predicts Spatial Response Patterns of Space-Specific Neurons in the Barn Owl Inferior Colliculus J. Neurosci., June 1, 2003; 23(11): 4677 - 4688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Koppl and C. E. Carr Computational Diversity in the Cochlear Nucleus Angularis of the Barn Owl J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 2313 - 2329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. A. Ruggero and A. N. Temchin The roles of the external, middle, and inner ears in determining the bandwidth of hearing PNAS, October 1, 2002; 99(20): 13206 - 13210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Pena, S. Viete, K. Funabiki, K. Saberi, and M. Konishi Cochlear and Neural Delays for Coincidence Detection in Owls J. Neurosci., December 1, 2001; 21(23): 9455 - 9459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. H. Keller and T. T. Takahashi Representation of Temporal Features of Complex Sounds by the Discharge Patterns of Neurons in the Owl's Inferior Colliculus J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2000; 84(5): 2638 - 2650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. A. Manley Cochlear mechanisms from a phylogenetic viewpoint PNAS, October 24, 2000; 97(22): 11736 - 11743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. A. Jones and S. M. Jones Spontaneous Activity in the Statoacoustic Ganglion of the Chicken Embryo J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2000; 83(3): 1452 - 1468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Koppl and G. Yates Coding of Sound Pressure Level in the Barn Owl's Auditory Nerve J. Neurosci., November 1, 1999; 19(21): 9674 - 9686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Imaizumi and G. S. Pollack Neural Coding of Sound Frequency by Cricket Auditory Receptors J. Neurosci., February 15, 1999; 19(4): 1508 - 1516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Koppl Phase Locking to High Frequencies in the Auditory Nerve and Cochlear Nucleus Magnocellularis of the Barn Owl, Tyto alba J. Neurosci., May 1, 1997; 17(9): 3312 - 3321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
