JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 77: 579-586, 1997;
0022-3077/97 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Svirskis, G.
Right arrow Articles by Hounsgaard, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Svirskis, G.
Right arrow Articles by Hounsgaard, J.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 77 No. 2 February 1997, pp. 579-586
Copyright ©1997 The American Physiological Society

Detection of a Membrane Shunt by DC Field Polarization During Intracellular and Whole Cell Recording

Gytis Svirskis, Aron Gutman, and Jørn Hounsgaard

Laboratory of Neurophysiology, Biomedical Research Institute, Kaunas Medical Academy; Faculty of Environmental Studies, Vytautas Magnus University, 3000 Kaunas, Lithuania; and Institute of Medical Physiology, Panum Institute, Copenhagen University, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark

Svirskis, Gytis, Aron Gutman, and Jørn Hounsgaard. Detection of a membrane shunt by DC field polarization during intracellular and whole cell recording. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 579-586, 1997. Lower input resistance with intracellular recording, rather than with whole cell recording, usually has been ascribed to a shunt produced by penetration injury. An alternative explanation is a higher input resistance during whole cell recording due to wash-out of cytoplasmatic substances. We have used neuronal polarization at the onset and termination of an applied electric field for shunt detection. An analytical expression was derived for field-induced polarization in a shunted ohmic cable. When the shunt is negligible, the transient response to a step in DC field decays much faster than the response to current injected through the recording electrode. In the case of a significant shunt an over- and undershoot of the transmembrane potential appear at the shunted end when the field is switched on and off. Over- and undershoot decay with the same slowest time constant as the response to injected current. The results for the cable are generalized for nonuniform fields and arbitrary branching neurons with homogeneous membrane. The field effect was calculated for two reconstructed neurons with different branching pattern. The calculations confirmed the theoretical inferences. The field polarization can be used for shunt detection. The theory was checked experimentally in 18 ventral neurons in transverse slices of the turtle spinal cord. In seven neurons, field-induced under- and overshoots were observed when sharp electrodes were used. This indicates the presence of an injury shunt. In the remaining 11 neurons, however, there were no under- or overshoots, indicating that a shunt is not always induced. When patch electrodes were used, the seal quality was checked by inducing a spike with a strong field stimulus before and after the rupture of the membrane. When the threshold field strength for spike initiation was not changed by membrane rupture, under- and overshoots were not observed. This was taken to indicate a good seal. In such recordings under- and overshoots were observed when a shunt was induced by local application of glycine. The fast and monotonic response to weak field stimulation suggests homogeneous electric properties of the soma-dendritic membrane when active conductances are not recruited. We propose using polarization by weak DC fields to ensure the quality of recordings with sharp and whole cell electrodes and for checking the ohmic homogeneity of the membrane. These controls are particularly important for evaluation of electrotonic parameters.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. M. ElBasiouny and V. K. Mushahwar
Suppressing the excitability of spinal motoneurons by extracellularly applied electrical fields: insights from computer simulations
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2007; 103(5): 1824 - 1836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W.-C. Li, S. R. Soffe, and A. Roberts
A Direct Comparison of Whole Cell Patch and Sharp Electrodes by Simultaneous Recording From Single Spinal Neurons in Frog Tadpoles
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 380 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. Bikson, M. Inoue, H. Akiyama, J. K. Deans, J. E. Fox, H. Miyakawa, and J. G. R. Jefferys
Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro
J. Physiol., May 15, 2004; 557(1): 175 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M.-C. Perreault
Motoneurons Have Different Membrane Resistance during Fictive Scratching and Weight Support
J. Neurosci., September 15, 2002; 22(18): 8259 - 8265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. Svirskis, A. Gutman, and J. Hounsgaard
Electrotonic Structure of Motoneurons in the Spinal Cord of the Turtle: Inferences for the Mechanisms of Bistability
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2001; 85(1): 391 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. Svirskis and J. Hounsgaard
Transmitter Regulation of Plateau Properties in Turtle Motoneurons
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 1998; 79(1): 45 - 50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online