The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 77 No. 4 April 1997, pp. 1950-1962
Copyright ©1997 The American Physiological Society

Spatially Organized Response Zones in Rat Olfactory Epithelium

John W. Scott, Donna E. Shannon, Jeff Charpentier, Lisa M. Davis, and Craig Kaplan

Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322-3030

Scott, John W., Donna E. Shannon, Jeff Charpentier, Lisa M. Davis, and Craig Kaplan. Spatially organized response zones in rat olfactory epithelium. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 1950-1962, 1997. Electroolfactogram recordings were made with a four-electrode assembly from the olfactory epithelium overlying the endoturbinate bones facing the nasal septum. In this study we tested whether odors of different chemical structures produce maximal responses along longitudinally oriented regions following the olfactory receptor gene expression zones described in the literature. The distribution of responses along the dorsal-to-ventral direction of this epithelium (i.e., across the expression zones) was tested in two types of experiments. In one, four electrodes were fixed along the dorsal-to-ventral axis of one turbinate bone. In the other, four electrodes were placed in corresponding positions on four turbinate bones and moved together up toward the top of the bone. These experiments compared the odorants limonene and -terpinene, which are simple hydrocarbons, with carvone and menthone, which differ from the hydrocarbons by the presence of ketone groups. All responses were standardized to an amyl acetate or ethyl butyrate standard. The responses to limonene and -terpinene were often larger for the ventral electrodes. The responses to carvone and menthone were largest for the dorsal electrodes. Intermediate electrodes gave responses that were intermediate in amplitude for these odors. The possibility that direction of air flow caused the observed response distributions was directly tested in experiments with odor nozzles placed in two positions. The relatively larger dorsal responses to carvone and relatively larger ventral responses to limonene were present despite odor nozzle position. We conclude that the responses to this set of odors vary systematically in a fashion parallel to the four gene expression zones. The odorant property that governs this response distribution may be related to the presence of oxygen-containing functional groups. Certain odors evoked larger responses at the intermediate electrode sites than at other sites. Cineole was the best example of this effect. This observation shows that not all oxygen-containing functional groups produce the same effect. Although we cannot exclude other possible mechanisms, these three response gradients may be produced by the four receptor expression zones described for many of the putative olfactory receptor genes. Therefore many of the receptors in each zone may share common properties. It remains to be determined whether this zonal input is significant in central odor processing. However, the correlation of odor chemical properties with the structure of receptor molecules in each zone may provide significant leads to structure-function relationships in vertebrate olfaction.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Lapid, H.-S. Seo, B. Schuster, E. Schneidman, Y. Roth, D. Harel, N. Sobel, and T. Hummel Odorant Concentration Dependence in Electroolfactograms Recorded From the Human Olfactory Epithelium J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2009; 102(4): 2121 - 2130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. C. Yang, P. W. Scherer, K. Zhao, and M. M. Mozell Numerical Modeling of Odorant Uptake in the Rat Nasal Cavity Chem Senses, March 1, 2007; 32(3): 273 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Scott, H. P. Acevedo, and L. Sherrill Effects of Concentration and Sniff Flow Rate on the Rat Electroolfactogram Chem Senses, July 1, 2006; 31(6): 581 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Scott Sniffing and Spatiotemporal Coding in Olfaction Chem Senses, February 1, 2006; 31(2): 119 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L. Youngentob, P. F. Kent, and F. L. Margolis OMP Gene Deletion Results in an Alteration in Odorant-Induced Mucosal Activity Patterns J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2003; 90(6): 3864 - 3873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.A. Chaput EOG Responses in Anesthetized Freely Breathing Rats Chem Senses, December 1, 2000; 25(6): 695 - 701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P.E. Scott-Johnson, D. Blakley, and J.W. Scott Effects of Air Flow on Rat Electroolfactogram Chem Senses, December 1, 2000; 25(6): 761 - 768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Ma and G. M. Shepherd Functional mosaic organization of mouse olfactory receptor neurons PNAS, October 23, 2000; (2000) 220301797. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. W. Scott, T. Brierley, and F. H. Schmidt Chemical Determinants of the Rat Electro-Olfactogram J. Neurosci., June 15, 2000; 20(12): 4721 - 4731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Scott and T. Brierley A Functional Map in Rat Olfactory Epithelium Chem Senses, December 1, 1999; 24(6): 679 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. W. Friedrich and S. I. Korsching Chemotopic, Combinatorial, and Noncombinatorial Odorant Representations in the Olfactory Bulb Revealed Using a Voltage-Sensitive Axon Tracer J. Neurosci., December 1, 1998; 18(23): 9977 - 9988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Dreyer The area code hypothesis revisited: Olfactory receptors and other related transmembrane receptors may function as the last digits in a cell surface code for assembling embryos PNAS, August 4, 1998; 95(16): 9072 - 9077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. C. Bozza and J. S. Kauer Odorant Response Properties of Convergent Olfactory Receptor Neurons J. Neurosci., June 15, 1998; 18(12): 4560 - 4569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Ma and G. M. Shepherd Functional mosaic organization of mouse olfactory receptor neurons PNAS, November 7, 2000; 97(23): 12869 - 12874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]