JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 77: 2549-2572, 1997;
0022-3077/97 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ding, J.
Right arrow Articles by Voigt, H. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ding, J.
Right arrow Articles by Voigt, H. F.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 77 No. 5 May 1997, pp. 2549-2572
Copyright ©1997 The American Physiological Society

Intracellular Response Properties of Units in the Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus of Unanesthetized Decerebrate Gerbil

Jiang Ding1 and Herbert F. Voigt1, 2

1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, 2 Department of Otolaryngology, and Hearing Research Center, Boston University, Boston Massachusetts 02215-2407

Ding, Jiang and Herbert F. Voigt. Intracellular response properties of units in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of unanesthetized decerebrate gerbil. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 2549-2572, 1997. Intracellular recording experiments on the dorsal cochlear nuclei of unanesthetized decerebrate gerbils were conducted. Acceptable recordings were those in which resting potentials were -50 mV or less and action potentials (APs) were >= 40 mV. Responses to short-duration tones and noise, and to current pulses delivered via recording electrodes, were acquired. Units were classified according to the response map scheme (types I-IV). Ninety-two acceptable recordings were made. Most units had simple APs (simple-spiking units); nine units had both simple and complex APs, which are bursts of spikes embedded on slow, transient depolarizations (complex-spiking units). Of 83 simple-spiking units, 46 were classified as follows: type I/III (9 units), type II (9 units), type III (25 units), type IV (2 units), and type IV-T (1 unit). One complex-spiking unit was classifiable (a type III unit); six were unclassifiable because of weak acoustic responses. Classifying 39 other simple-spiking units and 2 complex-spiking units was impossible, because they were either injured or lost before sufficient data were acquired. Many simple-spiking units showed depolarization or hyperpolarization (~5-10 mV) during acoustic stimulation; some were hyperpolarized during the stimulus-off period. Type I/III units were not hyperpolarized during off-best-frequency (off-BF) stimulation. In contrast, many type II units were hyperpolarized by off-BF frequencies, suggesting that they received strong inhibitory sideband inputs. When inhibited, some type III units were hyperpolarized. Type IV units were hyperpolarized during inhibition even at low levels (<60 dB SPL); sustained depolarizations occurred only at higher levels, suggesting that they receive strong inhibitory and weak excitatory inputs. Several intracellular response properties were statistically different from those of extracellularly recorded units. Intracellularly recorded type II units had higher thresholds and lower maximum BF-driven and noise-driven rates than their extracellularly recorded counterparts. Type I/III units recorded intracellularly had lower maximum BF-driven rates. Type III units recorded intracellularly had higher maximum noise rates compared with those recorded extracellularly. Weaker acoustic responses most likely result from membrane disruption, but heightened responses may be related to weakened chloride-channel-dependent inhibition due to altered driving forces resulting from KCl leakage. Firing rates of simple-spiking units increased monotonically with increasing levels of depolarizing current pulses. In contrast, many complex-spiking units responded nonmonotonically to depolarizing current injection. The monotonic rate-versus-current curves and the nonmonotonic rate-versus-sound level curves of type IV and III units suggest that the acoustic behavior is the result of extrinsic inhibitory inputs and not due solely to intrinsic membrane properties.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Ding, T. E. Benson, and H. F. Voigt
Acoustic and Current-Pulse Responses of Identified Neurons in the Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus of Unanesthetized, Decerebrate Gerbils
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1999; 82(6): 3434 - 3457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. M. Gardner, L. O. Trussell, and D. Oertel
Time Course and Permeation of Synaptic AMPA Receptors in Cochlear Nuclear Neurons Correlate with Input
J. Neurosci., October 15, 1999; 19(20): 8721 - 8729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. A. Spirou, K. A. Davis, I. Nelken, and E. D. Young
Spectral Integration by Type II Interneurons in Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 648 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. S. Rhode
Vertical Cell Responses to Sound in Cat Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 1019 - 1032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. A. Davis and H. F. Voigt
Evidence of Stimulus-Dependent Correlated Activity in the Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus of Decerebrate Gerbils
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1997; 78(1): 229 - 247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online