JN Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 78: 261-270, 1997;
0022-3077/97 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, N. P.
Right arrow Articles by Rhode, W. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, N. P.
Right arrow Articles by Rhode, W. S.

The Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 78 No. 1 July 1997, pp. 261-270
Copyright ©1997 The American Physiological Society

Mechanical Responses to Two-Tone Distortion Products in the Apical and Basal Turns of the Mammalian Cochlea

N. P. Cooper and W. S. Rhode

Department of Neurophysiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Cooper, N. P. and W. S. Rhode. Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 261-270, 1997. Mechanical responses to one- and two-tone acoustic stimuli were recorded from the cochlear partition in the apical turn of the chinchilla cochlea, the basal turn of the guinea pig cochlea, and the hook region of the guinea pig cochlea. The most sensitive or "best" frequencies (BFs) for the sites studied were ~500 Hz, 17 kHz, and 30 kHz, respectively. Responses to the cubic difference tone (CDT), 2F1 - F2 (where F1 and F2 are the frequencies of the primary stimuli), were characterized at each site. Responses to the quadratic difference tone (QDT), F2 - F1, were also characterized in the apical turn preparations (QDT responses were too small to measure in the basal cochlea). The observed responses to BF QDTs and CDTs and to BF CDTs at each site appeared similar in many ways; the relative magnitudes of the responses were highest at low-to-moderate sound pressure levels (SPLs), for example, and the absolute magnitudes grew nonmonotonically with increases in the level of either primary (L1 or L2) alone. The peak effective levels of the CDT and QDT responses were also similar, at around -20 dB re L1 and/or L2. In other respects, however, the responses to CDTs and QDTs and to BF CDTs at each site behaved quite differently. At low-to-moderate SPLs, for example, most CDT phase leads decreased with increases in either L1 or L2, whereas most QDT phase leads increased with increasing L1 and varied little with L2. Most CDT responses also varied monotonically with equal-level primaries (i.e., when L1 L2), whereas most QDT responses varied nonmonotonically. Different responses also varied in different ways when F1 and F2 were varied. Apical turn QDT responses were observed over a very wide F1/F2 range (F1 =1-12 kHz), but were usually largest for stimuli <2-4 kHz. Apical turn CDT levels decreased (at rates of ~40-80 dB/octave) only when the frequency ratio F2/F1 increased beyond ~1.4-1.5. In the basal turn and hook regions, the CDT levels depended nonmonotonically on F2/F1, with the eventual rates of decrease being ~200 dB/octave. Optimal frequency ratios for the CDT increased from (F2 < 1.1F1) to (F2 approx  1.2F1) with increasing SPL in the basal turn, but were stable at around F2/F1 approx  1.05 in the hook region. CDT phase leads tended to increase with increasing F2/F1 in all three regions of the cochlea, particularly at low-to-moderate SPLs. These findings are discussed in relation to previous studies of cochlear mechanics, physiology, and psychophysics.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. Abel and M. Kossl
Sensitive Response to Low-Frequency Cochlear Distortion Products in the Auditory Midbrain
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2009; 101(3): 1560 - 1574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. N. Temchin, N. C. Rich, and M. A. Ruggero
Threshold Tuning Curves of Chinchilla Auditory-Nerve Fibers. I. Dependence on Characteristic Frequency and Relation to the Magnitudes of Cochlear Vibrations
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2008; 100(5): 2889 - 2898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
J. Ashmore
Cochlear Outer Hair Cell Motility
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 173 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Ren, W. He, M. Scott, and A. L. Nuttall
Group Delay of Acoustic Emissions in the Ear
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2785 - 2791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. Cedolin and B. Delgutte
Pitch of Complex Tones: Rate-Place and Interspike Interval Representations in the Auditory Nerve
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 347 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. van der Heijden and P. X. Joris
Cochlear Phase and Amplitude Retrieved from the Auditory Nerve at Arbitrary Frequencies
J. Neurosci., October 8, 2003; 23(27): 9194 - 9198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. A. Schmiedt, H. Lang, H.-o. Okamura, and B. A. Schulte
Effects of Furosemide Applied Chronically to the Round Window: A Model of Metabolic Presbyacusis
J. Neurosci., November 1, 2002; 22(21): 9643 - 9650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
L. Robles and M. A. Ruggero
Mechanics of the Mammalian Cochlea
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2001; 81(3): 1305 - 1352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. J. Kolston
Comparing in vitro, in situ, and in vivo experimental data in a three-dimensional model of mammalian cochlear mechanics
PNAS, March 30, 1999; 96(7): 3676 - 3681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
N. P Cooper
Harmonic distortion on the basilar membrane in the basal turn of the guinea-pig cochlea
J. Physiol., May 15, 1998; 509(1): 277 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online